FDAT vs. EAOR
FDAT (Tactical Advantage ETF) and EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. FDAT is actively managed, while EAOR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDAT returned 8.97%/yr vs 13.24%/yr for EAOR. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDAT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOR.
Performance
FDAT vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDAT achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly lower than EAOR's 6.77% return.
FDAT
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- 1Y
- 11.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOR
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- —
FDAT vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF | 4.50% | 7.50% | 9.90% | 5.90% |
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 6.77% | 15.59% | 10.69% | 8.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDAT and EAOR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FDAT and EAOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDAT vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank
FDAT
EAOR
FDAT vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDAT | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.33 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.42 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 10.32 | -4.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDAT vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDAT drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, smaller than the maximum EAOR drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAT and EAOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDAT | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -22.91% | +14.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.88% | -6.62% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.20% | -10.28% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -1.32% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.25% | -5.01% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.55% | +0.60% |
Volatility
FDAT vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison
Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) have volatilities of 3.78% and 3.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDAT | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 3.64% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 7.57% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 9.04% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.59% | 10.61% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.59% | 10.43% | -0.84% |
FDAT vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDAT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOR's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDAT vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison
FDAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than EAOR's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 2.35% | 2.45% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 1.99% | 1.39% | 1.07% |
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF | 5.88% | 4.77% | 8.99% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDAT and EAOR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDAT has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to EAOR (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDAT dropped -8.20% vs EAOR's -22.91%.
On 3-year performance, EAOR leads with 13.24% vs 8.97% for FDAT. On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EAOR has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FDAT.
FDAT has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 2.35% for EAOR.
They also come from different issuers: Tactical Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FDAT and 0.18% for EAOR.
EAOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDAT and EAOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer