FDAT vs. EAOM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM).

FDAT and EAOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDAT is an actively managed fund by Tactical Funds. It was launched on Apr 19, 2023. EAOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2020.

Performance

FDAT vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FDAT vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF	0.92%	7.50%	9.90%	6.14%
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	-0.98%	12.90%	7.29%	6.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDAT achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than EAOM's -0.98% return.

FDAT

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -4.19%
• YTD: 0.92%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 8.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAOM

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 6M: 0.86%
• 1Y: 10.87%
• 3Y*: 8.56%
• 5Y*: 3.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDAT vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDAT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.

FDAT

Tactical Advantage ETF

EAOM

iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF

Return for Risk

FDAT vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDAT

FDAT Risk / Return Rank: 45
FDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 42

EAOM

EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 76
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDAT vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDAT	EAOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	1.36	-0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	1.98	-0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.28	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	1.94	-0.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.08	8.22	-4.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDAT vs. EAOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the EAOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDAT and EAOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDAT	EAOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	1.36	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.64	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between FDAT and EAOM is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FDAT vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison

FDAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than EAOM's 2.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF	5.77%	4.77%	8.99%	1.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	2.92%	2.89%	2.89%	2.70%	1.93%	1.32%	1.02%

Drawdowns

FDAT vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDAT drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, smaller than the maximum EAOM drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAT and EAOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDAT	EAOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-20.73%	+12.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	-5.67%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.43%	-3.67%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-5.09%	+2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	1.34%	+0.88%

Volatility

FDAT vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) is 2.12%, while iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that FDAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDAT	EAOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	3.32%	-1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.12%	4.81%	+3.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.34%	8.03%	+2.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.50%	8.02%	+1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.50%	7.91%	+1.59%