PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOA vs. ESGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOA vs. ESGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOA achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly lower than ESGU's 11.95% return.


EAOA

1D
0.38%
1M
4.64%
YTD
10.71%
6M
11.62%
1Y
25.70%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*

ESGU

1D
0.28%
1M
6.02%
YTD
11.95%
6M
12.23%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
22.33%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOA vs. ESGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
10.71%18.41%13.79%18.27%-17.76%14.52%19.79%
ESGU
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
11.95%16.90%24.31%25.79%-20.27%26.89%23.53%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOA and ESGU is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.96

The correlation between EAOA and ESGU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAOA vs. ESGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAOA
ESGU

Technology

28.9%
38.7%

Financial Services

13.5%
11.5%

Industrials

9.0%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
9.4%

Communication Services

7.3%
9.8%

Healthcare

6.8%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.9%

Energy

3.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

2.4%
1.6%

Utilities

2.3%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.1%

Technology

EAOA
28.9%
ESGU
38.7%

Financial Services

EAOA
13.5%
ESGU
11.5%

Industrials

EAOA
9.0%
ESGU
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EAOA
7.7%
ESGU
9.4%

Communication Services

EAOA
7.3%
ESGU
9.8%

Healthcare

EAOA
6.8%
ESGU
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

EAOA
3.7%
ESGU
3.9%

Energy

EAOA
3.0%
ESGU
3.5%

Basic Materials

EAOA
2.4%
ESGU
1.6%

Utilities

EAOA
2.3%
ESGU
2.4%

Real Estate

EAOA
1.6%
ESGU
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOA vs. ESGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOA
EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGU
ESGU Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ESGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGU Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGU Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOA vs. ESGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOAESGUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

2.46

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.38

3.31

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.28

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.21

14.96

-0.75

EAOA vs. ESGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOA Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the ESGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOA and ESGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOAESGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.46

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.76

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.84

+0.10

Drawdowns

EAOA vs. ESGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, smaller than the maximum ESGU drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and ESGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOAESGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.06%

-33.87%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-9.26%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-19.32%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

-26.15%

+1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-4.89%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.03%

-0.19%

Volatility

EAOA vs. ESGU - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) at 2.77%. This indicates that EAOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAOAESGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.77%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

9.17%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.72%

12.13%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.24%

17.32%

-4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.14%

18.60%

-5.46%

EAOA vs. ESGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGU's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EAOA vs. ESGU - Dividend Comparison

EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than ESGU's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
1.94%2.10%2.09%2.21%1.93%1.48%1.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESGU
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
0.91%0.99%1.18%1.43%1.58%1.06%1.27%1.32%1.73%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, EAOA and ESGU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EAOA has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to ESGU (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOA dropped -25.06% vs ESGU's -33.87%.

On 5-year performance, ESGU leads with 13.13% vs 8.85% for EAOA. On fees, ESGU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ESGU has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGU has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EAOA.

EAOA has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.91% for ESGU.

EAOA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ESGU is Large Cap Blend Equities. EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index, while ESGU tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOA and 0.15% for ESGU.

ESGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOA and ESGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer