FDAT vs. ASET

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

FDAT (Tactical Advantage ETF) and ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. FDAT is actively managed, while ASET is passively managed. FDAT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ASET.

Performance

FDAT vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FDAT

• 1D: -2.14%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 6M: 2.78%
• 1Y: 10.52%
• 3Y*: 8.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDAT vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF	-1.09%
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%

FDAT vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDAT	ASET
Financial Services	22.5%	-
Industrials	21.8%	16.3%
Technology	14.9%	0.2%
Basic Materials	9.2%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	0.1%
Energy	7.8%	7.8%
Real Estate	5.4%	41.6%
Healthcare	3.2%	2.2%
Utilities	2.8%	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	1.1%
Communication Services	1.7%	12.1%

Return for Risk

FDAT vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDAT

FDAT Risk / Return Rank: 35
FDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDAT vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDAT	ASET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.39	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDAT	ASET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	—	—

Drawdowns

FDAT vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDAT drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAT and ASET.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDAT	ASET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	0.00%	-8.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	0.00%	-2.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	0.00%	-2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDAT	ASET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.24%	0.00%	+10.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.58%	0.00%	+9.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.58%	0.00%	+9.58%

FDAT vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDAT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDAT vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

FDAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF	5.67%	4.77%	8.99%	1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FDAT or ASET?

On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDAT or ASET?

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FDAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDAT or ASET?

FDAT has the higher dividend yield at 5.67%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

What is the main difference between FDAT and ASET?

They also come from different issuers: Tactical Funds and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FDAT and 0.57% for ASET.