EAOA vs. FDEWX
EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) and FDEWX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund Investor Class) are both funds - EAOA is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index, while FDEWX is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by Fidelity. EAOA is passively managed, while FDEWX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EAOA returned 8.15%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for FDEWX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EAOA charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for FDEWX.
Performance
EAOA vs. FDEWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOA achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly lower than FDEWX's 11.87% return.
EAOA
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 21.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- —
FDEWX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 26.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
EAOA vs. FDEWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 8.44% | 18.41% | 13.79% | 18.27% | -17.76% | 14.52% | 19.79% |
FDEWX Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund Investor Class | 11.87% | 21.39% | 14.14% | 19.95% | -18.01% | 15.88% | 21.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOA and FDEWX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between EAOA and FDEWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOA vs. FDEWX — Risk / Return Rank
EAOA
FDEWX
EAOA vs. FDEWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund Investor Class (FDEWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAOA | FDEWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 3.08 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | 13.26 | -1.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAOA vs. FDEWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, smaller than the maximum FDEWX drawdown of -30.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and FDEWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOA | FDEWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.06% | -30.69% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -9.07% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -14.74% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -26.22% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -0.66% | -1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -4.22% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.10% | -0.22% |
Volatility
EAOA vs. FDEWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) is 4.64%, while Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund Investor Class (FDEWX) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that EAOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOA | FDEWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 5.06% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 10.39% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.44% | 12.43% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 14.52% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 15.23% | -2.03% |
EAOA vs. FDEWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FDEWX's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EAOA vs. FDEWX - Dividend Comparison
EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than FDEWX's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 1.98% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDEWX Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund Investor Class | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.85% | 10.83% | 2.36% | 1.93% | 2.42% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, EAOA and FDEWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FDEWX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to EAOA (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOA dropped -25.06% vs FDEWX's -30.69%.
FDEWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAOA and FDEWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer