EAOA vs. AOA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA).
EAOA and AOA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EAOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2020. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. Both EAOA and AOA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EAOA or AOA.
Key characteristics
| EAOA | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.46% | 14.90% |
| 1Y Return | 23.09% | 22.27% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.77% | 4.44% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.56 | 2.53 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.61 | 3.56 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.48 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.67 | 3.40 |
| Martin Ratio | 16.54 | 16.66 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.55% | 1.49% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.03% | 9.81% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.06% | -28.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.98% | -1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOA and AOA is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EAOA vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EAOA having a 15.46% return and AOA slightly lower at 14.90%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EAOA vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EAOA vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EAOA vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than AOA's 2.10% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.01% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.10% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
EAOA vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and AOA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EAOA vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) have volatilities of 2.67% and 2.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.