PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOA vs. EAOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOA vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOA achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than EAOR's 7.50% return.


EAOA

1D
-0.71%
1M
4.36%
YTD
9.93%
6M
10.44%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*

EAOR

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.41%
YTD
7.50%
6M
7.84%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
13.83%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOA vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
9.93%18.41%13.79%18.27%-17.76%14.52%19.79%
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
7.50%15.59%10.69%14.96%-16.66%10.51%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOA and EAOR is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.99

The correlation between EAOA and EAOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAOA vs. EAOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAOA
EAOR

Technology

28.9%
22.3%

Financial Services

13.5%
10.3%

Industrials

9.0%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
5.8%

Communication Services

7.3%
5.6%

Healthcare

6.8%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
2.8%

Energy

3.0%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.4%
1.8%

Utilities

2.3%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.2%

Technology

EAOA
28.9%
EAOR
22.3%

Financial Services

EAOA
13.5%
EAOR
10.3%

Industrials

EAOA
9.0%
EAOR
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EAOA
7.7%
EAOR
5.8%

Communication Services

EAOA
7.3%
EAOR
5.6%

Healthcare

EAOA
6.8%
EAOR
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

EAOA
3.7%
EAOR
2.8%

Energy

EAOA
3.0%
EAOR
2.3%

Basic Materials

EAOA
2.4%
EAOR
1.8%

Utilities

EAOA
2.3%
EAOR
1.7%

Real Estate

EAOA
1.6%
EAOR
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOA vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOA
EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOR
EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOA vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOAEAORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.97

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

13.04

+0.26

EAOA vs. EAOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the EAOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOA and EAOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOAEAORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.30

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.61

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.87

+0.05

Drawdowns

EAOA vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, which is greater than EAOR's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and EAOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOAEAORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.06%

-22.91%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-6.62%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-10.28%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

-22.91%

-2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.65%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-5.05%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.50%

+0.34%

Volatility

EAOA vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) at 2.79%. This indicates that EAOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAOAEAORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

2.79%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

6.90%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.75%

8.55%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.25%

10.52%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.14%

10.39%

+2.75%

EAOA vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EAOA and EAOR have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EAOA vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison

EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than EAOR's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
1.95%2.10%2.09%2.21%1.93%1.48%1.12%
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
2.34%2.45%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, EAOA and EAOR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EAOA has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to EAOR (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOA dropped -25.06% vs EAOR's -22.91%.

On 5-year performance, EAOA leads with 8.52% vs 6.41% for EAOR. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, EAOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EAOA has performed better with a 8.52% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOA and EAOR have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

EAOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.95% for EAOA.

EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index, while EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index.

EAOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOA and EAOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer