EAOA vs. EAOR
EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) and EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from iShares - EAOA tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index while EAOR tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EAOA returned 8.52%/yr vs 6.41%/yr for EAOR. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
EAOA vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOA achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than EAOR's 7.50% return.
EAOA
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 24.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
EAOR
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 19.56%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- —
EAOA vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 9.93% | 18.41% | 13.79% | 18.27% | -17.76% | 14.52% | 19.79% |
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 7.50% | 15.59% | 10.69% | 14.96% | -16.66% | 10.51% | 15.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOA and EAOR is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between EAOA and EAOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
EAOA vs. EAOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EAOA
EAOR
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EAOA
EAOR
Financial Services
EAOA
EAOR
Industrials
EAOA
EAOR
Consumer Cyclical
EAOA
EAOR
Communication Services
EAOA
EAOR
Healthcare
EAOA
EAOR
Consumer Defensive
EAOA
EAOR
Energy
EAOA
EAOR
Basic Materials
EAOA
EAOR
Utilities
EAOA
EAOR
Real Estate
EAOA
EAOR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOA vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank
EAOA
EAOR
EAOA vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOA | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.97 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.30 | 13.04 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOA | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.30 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.61 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.87 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
EAOA vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, which is greater than EAOR's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and EAOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOA | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.06% | -22.91% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -6.62% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -10.28% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -22.91% | -2.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -0.65% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.31% | -5.05% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 1.50% | +0.34% |
Volatility
EAOA vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) at 2.79%. This indicates that EAOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOA | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 2.79% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 6.90% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.75% | 8.55% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 10.52% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 10.39% | +2.75% |
EAOA vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EAOA and EAOR have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EAOA vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison
EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than EAOR's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 1.95% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% |
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 2.34% | 2.45% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 1.99% | 1.39% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, EAOA and EAOR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EAOA has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to EAOR (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOA dropped -25.06% vs EAOR's -22.91%.
On 5-year performance, EAOA leads with 8.52% vs 6.41% for EAOR. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, EAOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EAOA has performed better with a 8.52% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOA and EAOR have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
EAOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.95% for EAOA.
EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index, while EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index.
EAOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAOA and EAOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer