FCTR vs. SPYG
FCTR (First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCTR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCTR returned 3.73%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for SPYG. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCTR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
FCTR vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCTR achieves a 12.71% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 8.49% return.
FCTR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 12.71%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 20.02%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 8.49%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 25.40%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
FCTR vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTR First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | 12.71% | 8.63% | 19.54% | 0.71% | -20.42% | 21.13% | 30.17% | 30.91% | -12.50% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.49% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -12.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCTR and SPYG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FCTR and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
FCTR vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCTR
SPYG
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FCTR
SPYG
Industrials
FCTR
SPYG
Financial Services
FCTR
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
FCTR
SPYG
Healthcare
FCTR
SPYG
Basic Materials
FCTR
SPYG
Energy
FCTR
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
FCTR
SPYG
Communication Services
FCTR
SPYG
Utilities
FCTR
SPYG
Real Estate
FCTR
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCTR vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
FCTR
SPYG
FCTR vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCTR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 1.81 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.47 | 7.15 | -0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCTR vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCTR drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTR and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCTR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.10% | -67.63% | +30.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -13.76% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.63% | -22.14% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.10% | -32.67% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -5.71% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.34% | -24.28% | +13.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 3.48% | -0.38% |
Volatility
FCTR vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) is 6.86%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that FCTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCTR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 7.26% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 13.85% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 17.22% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 21.36% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 20.72% | +1.24% |
FCTR vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCTR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCTR vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
FCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SPYG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTR First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 1.04% | 1.38% | 0.46% | 0.44% | 0.98% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCTR and SPYG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to FCTR (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTR dropped -37.10% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 14.06% vs 3.73% for FCTR. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FCTR has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 14.06% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FCTR.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.36% for FCTR.
FCTR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FCTR and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCTR and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer