FCTR vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
FCTR and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCTR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jul 25, 2018. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FCTR or BDGS.
Correlation
The correlation between FCTR and BDGS is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FCTR vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FCTR:
0.17
BDGS:
1.39
FCTR:
0.37
BDGS:
2.22
FCTR:
1.05
BDGS:
1.41
FCTR:
0.16
BDGS:
1.74
FCTR:
0.47
BDGS:
8.44
FCTR:
7.69%
BDGS:
1.88%
FCTR:
21.49%
BDGS:
11.51%
FCTR:
-37.10%
BDGS:
-9.12%
FCTR:
-13.65%
BDGS:
-2.90%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCTR achieves a -5.86% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's -0.27% return.
FCTR
-5.86%
0.73%
-1.97%
3.92%
9.51%
N/A
BDGS
-0.27%
1.08%
4.30%
15.75%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCTR vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCTR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FCTR vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FCTR
BDGS
FCTR vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FCTR vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
FCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than BDGS's 1.82% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTR First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | 0.83% | 0.82% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 0.46% | 0.44% | 0.98% | 0.66% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 1.82% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCTR vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCTR drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTR and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FCTR vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) has a higher volatility of 12.89% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 9.08%. This indicates that FCTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.