PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCTR vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCTR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTR achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 14.92% return.


FCTR

1D
-3.51%
1M
4.38%
YTD
11.97%
6M
11.33%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-4.80%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
14.92%
6M
13.01%
1Y
33.69%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
16.70%
10Y*
21.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
11.97%8.63%19.54%0.71%-20.42%21.13%30.17%30.91%-12.94%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
14.92%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-13.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTR and QQQ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.77

The correlation between FCTR and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCTR vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCTR
QQQ

Technology

19.3%
53.8%

Financial Services

18.7%
0.2%

Healthcare

9.4%
4.2%

Industrials

9.4%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
7.7%

Real Estate

7.8%
0.1%

Energy

6.5%
0.6%

Basic Materials

4.6%
1.1%

Utilities

4.3%
1.4%

Communication Services

3.5%
15.8%

Technology

FCTR
19.3%
QQQ
53.8%

Financial Services

FCTR
18.7%
QQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

FCTR
9.4%
QQQ
4.2%

Industrials

FCTR
9.4%
QQQ
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FCTR
8.5%
QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

FCTR
8.1%
QQQ
7.7%

Real Estate

FCTR
7.8%
QQQ
0.1%

Energy

FCTR
6.5%
QQQ
0.6%

Basic Materials

FCTR
4.6%
QQQ
1.1%

Utilities

FCTR
4.3%
QQQ
1.4%

Communication Services

FCTR
3.5%
QQQ
15.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCTR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTR
FCTR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCTRQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.37

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

2.94

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

11.22

-4.65

FCTR vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTR and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCTRQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.11

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.75

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.40

+0.05

Drawdowns

FCTR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTR drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTR and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCTRQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-82.97%

+45.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-11.96%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.63%

-22.77%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.10%

-35.12%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-5.51%

+2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-32.78%

+22.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.13%

-0.07%

Volatility

FCTR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.68%. This indicates that FCTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCTRQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

6.68%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

13.12%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.91%

16.69%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.70%

22.47%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

22.34%

-0.37%

FCTR vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCTR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than QQQ's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
0.36%0.30%0.82%1.04%1.38%0.46%0.44%0.98%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.40%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCTR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCTR has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to QQQ (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTR dropped -37.10% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 16.70% vs 3.70% for FCTR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 16.70% return vs 3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FCTR.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.36% for FCTR.

FCTR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FCTR and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCTR and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer