PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FCOM vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FCOM vs. USO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCOM (Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FCOM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FCOM returned 11.99%/yr vs 4.07%/yr for USO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCOM charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.

Performance

FCOM vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 11.99%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.07% annualized return.

FCOM

1D
-0.87%
1M
-2.85%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
0.27%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
11.99%

USO

1D
2.62%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
103.67%
6M
99.35%
1Y
101.55%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCOM vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCOM
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF		-1.60%26.06%33.05%44.65%-38.97%13.88%28.33%26.69%-5.33%8.20%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP		103.67%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FCOM and USO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.16

The correlation between FCOM and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF

United States Oil Fund LP

Often compared with FCOM:
FCOM vs. XLCFCOM vs. VOXFCOM vs. FBMPXFCOM vs. FTECFCOM vs. IXPFCOM vs. FNCLFCOM vs. VOO
Often compared with USO:
USO vs. XLEUSO vs. BNOUSO vs. UCOUSO vs. USLUSO vs. OILKUSO vs. DBOUSO vs. WTI

Return for Risk

FCOM vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FCOM
FCOM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCOM vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FCOMUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.31
2.31

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.97
2.89

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

5.01

-3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.67

9.42

-3.75

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCOM vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCOM and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FCOMUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

2.31

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.68

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.10

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

-0.18

+0.74

Drawdowns

FCOM vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and USO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FCOMUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.76%

-98.19%

+51.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.48%

-20.39%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.16%

-26.05%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.76%

-36.23%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.76%

-86.75%

+39.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.88%

-85.01%

+80.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-75.30%

+66.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

10.82%

-7.28%

Volatility

FCOM vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is 4.24%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that FCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FCOMUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

14.87%

-10.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

38.23%

-27.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

44.20%

-28.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

36.06%

-14.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

39.00%

-18.04%

FCOM vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCOM has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCOM vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCOM
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF		0.94%0.88%0.87%0.77%1.04%0.90%0.68%0.86%2.78%11.70%2.27%2.92%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FCOM and USO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to FCOM (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOM dropped -46.76% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 10-year performance, FCOM leads with 11.99% vs 4.07% for USO. On fees, FCOM is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FCOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FCOM has performed better with a 11.99% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCOM is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

FCOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

FCOM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FCOM and 0.86% for USO.

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCOM and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer