PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCOM vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCOM vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 9.68% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 11.60%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.


FCOM

1D
0.08%
1M
-5.25%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
11.60%

SCHB

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
9.68%
6M
9.76%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
20.63%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCOM vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCOM
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
-3.17%26.06%33.05%44.65%-38.97%13.88%28.33%26.69%-5.33%8.20%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
9.68%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FCOM and SCHB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.76

The correlation between FCOM and SCHB shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCOM vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCOM
SCHB

Communication Services

98.0%
9.8%

Technology

1.7%
37.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
9.8%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.3%

Energy

-

3.3%

Financial Services

-

11.4%

Healthcare

-

8.8%

Industrials

-

9.1%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Communication Services

FCOM
98.0%
SCHB
9.8%

Technology

FCOM
1.7%
SCHB
37.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FCOM
0.2%
SCHB
9.8%

Real Estate

FCOM
0.1%
SCHB
2.3%

Basic Materials

FCOM

-

SCHB
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

FCOM

-

SCHB
4.3%

Energy

FCOM

-

SCHB
3.3%

Financial Services

FCOM

-

SCHB
11.4%

Healthcare

FCOM

-

SCHB
8.8%

Industrials

FCOM

-

SCHB
9.1%

Utilities

FCOM

-

SCHB
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCOM vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCOM
FCOM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCOM vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCOMSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.35

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.78

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

12.44

-8.39

FCOM vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCOM and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCOM vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCOMSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.76%

-35.27%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.48%

-8.91%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.16%

-19.34%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.76%

-25.41%

-21.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.76%

-35.27%

-11.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.40%

-2.15%

-4.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-4.11%

-4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

1.99%

+1.69%

Volatility

FCOM vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is 4.08%, while Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that FCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCOMSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

4.60%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

9.86%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

12.63%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.19%

17.31%

+3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

18.35%

+2.61%

FCOM vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCOM has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCOM vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than SCHB's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCOM
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
0.96%0.88%0.87%0.77%1.04%0.90%0.68%0.86%2.78%11.70%2.27%2.92%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.03%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCOM and SCHB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHB has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to FCOM (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOM dropped -46.76% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 15.01% vs 11.60% for FCOM. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FCOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 11.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FCOM.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.96% for FCOM.

FCOM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FCOM and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCOM and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer