FCOM vs. SCHB
FCOM (Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCOM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while SCHB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FCOM returned 11.60%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for SCHB. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCOM charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
FCOM vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 9.68% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 11.60%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.
FCOM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
SCHB
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
FCOM vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | -3.17% | 26.06% | 33.05% | 44.65% | -38.97% | 13.88% | 28.33% | 26.69% | -5.33% | 8.20% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 9.68% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 30.79% | -5.43% | 21.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCOM and SCHB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FCOM and SCHB shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FCOM vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCOM
SCHB
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
FCOM
SCHB
Technology
FCOM
SCHB
Consumer Cyclical
FCOM
SCHB
Real Estate
FCOM
SCHB
Basic Materials
FCOM
-
SCHB
Consumer Defensive
FCOM
-
SCHB
Energy
FCOM
-
SCHB
Financial Services
FCOM
-
SCHB
Healthcare
FCOM
-
SCHB
Industrials
FCOM
-
SCHB
Utilities
FCOM
-
SCHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCOM vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
FCOM
SCHB
FCOM vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCOM | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 2.78 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.05 | 12.44 | -8.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCOM vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCOM | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.76% | -35.27% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -8.91% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -19.34% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.76% | -25.41% | -21.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.76% | -35.27% | -11.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.40% | -2.15% | -4.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -4.11% | -4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 1.99% | +1.69% |
Volatility
FCOM vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is 4.08%, while Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that FCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCOM | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 4.60% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 9.86% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.43% | 12.63% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 17.31% | +3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 18.35% | +2.61% |
FCOM vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCOM has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FCOM vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than SCHB's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 0.96% | 0.88% | 0.87% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 11.70% | 2.27% | 2.92% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCOM and SCHB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHB has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to FCOM (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOM dropped -46.76% vs SCHB's -35.27%.
On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 15.01% vs 11.60% for FCOM. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FCOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 11.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FCOM.
SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.96% for FCOM.
FCOM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FCOM and 0.03% for SCHB.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCOM and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer