FCOM vs. DGRO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCOM (Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FCOM tracks the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index while DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FCOM returned 11.99%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for DGRO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.

Performance

FCOM vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 11.99%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.

FCOM

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -2.85%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: 20.03%
• 3Y*: 23.77%
• 5Y*: 7.42%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

DGRO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 3.14%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 8.75%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 16.99%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 13.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCOM vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF	-1.60%	26.06%	33.05%	44.65%	-38.97%	13.88%	28.33%	26.69%	-5.33%	8.20%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	8.76%	15.69%	16.62%	10.47%	-7.91%	26.64%	9.50%	29.87%	-2.38%	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FCOM and DGRO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014	0.64

The correlation between FCOM and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCOM vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCOM	DGRO
Communication Services	98.5%	0.1%
Technology	1.2%	19.4%
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	5.7%
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	11.5%
Energy	-	5.6%
Financial Services	-	21.2%
Healthcare	-	16.4%
Industrials	-	10.8%
Utilities	-	6.9%

Return for Risk

FCOM vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCOM

FCOM Risk / Return Rank: 34
FCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 36

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 71
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCOM vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCOM	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	2.39	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	3.49	-1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.43	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	3.50	-2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.67	13.52	-7.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCOM vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCOM and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCOM	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	2.39	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.77	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.80	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.76	-0.20

Drawdowns

FCOM vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and DGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCOM	DGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.76%	-35.10%	-11.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.48%	-6.47%	-7.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.16%	-14.03%	-7.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.76%	-19.31%	-27.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.76%	-35.10%	-11.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.88%	-0.28%	-4.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.66%	-3.44%	-5.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	1.67%	+1.87%

Volatility

FCOM vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that FCOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCOM	DGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	2.21%	+2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.02%	6.91%	+4.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	9.48%	+5.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.17%	13.82%	+7.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.96%	16.62%	+4.34%

FCOM vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FCOM and DGRO have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FCOM vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	1.96%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF	0.94%	0.88%	0.87%	0.77%	1.04%	0.90%	0.68%	0.86%	2.78%	11.70%	2.27%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCOM and DGRO in my portfolio?

FCOM and DGRO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCOM or DGRO?

FCOM has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOM dropped -46.76% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

Which ETF is better, FCOM or DGRO?

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.30% vs 11.99% for FCOM. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCOM or DGRO?

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 11.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCOM or DGRO?

FCOM and DGRO have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCOM or DGRO?

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.94% for FCOM.

What is the main difference between FCOM and DGRO?

FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.