FCN vs. CLH
FCN (FTI Consulting, Inc.) and CLH (Clean Harbors, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — FCN in Consulting Services, CLH in Waste Management. Over the past 10 years, FCN returned 13.95%/yr vs 18.14%/yr for CLH. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FCN vs. CLH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCN achieves a -7.11% return, which is significantly lower than CLH's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FCN has underperformed CLH with an annualized return of 13.95%, while CLH has yielded a comparatively higher 18.14% annualized return.
FCN
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- YTD
- -7.11%
- 6M
- -4.07%
- 1Y
- -3.25%
- 3Y*
- -6.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
CLH
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 23.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 24.01%
- 10Y*
- 18.14%
FCN vs. CLH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCN FTI Consulting, Inc. | -7.11% | -10.62% | -4.03% | 25.41% | 3.51% | 37.33% | 0.96% | 66.06% | 55.12% | -4.70% |
CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 18.71% | 1.89% | 31.88% | 52.92% | 14.38% | 31.10% | -11.25% | 73.76% | -8.95% | -2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCN and CLH is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 1996 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
FCN:
$10.96
CLH:
$7.40
FCN:
14.47
CLH:
37.63
FCN:
2.66
CLH:
1.50
FCN:
1.00
CLH:
2.46
FCN:
$3.87B
CLH:
$6.06B
FCN:
$1.23B
CLH:
$1.81B
FCN:
$462.64M
CLH:
$1.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCN vs. CLH — Risk / Return Rank
FCN
CLH
FCN vs. CLH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCN | CLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.19 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.20 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 3.75 | -4.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCN | CLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 0.87 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.84 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.52 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
FCN vs. CLH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCN drawdown since its inception was -88.02%, smaller than the maximum CLH drawdown of -93.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCN and CLH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCN | CLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.02% | -93.48% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.14% | -19.45% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.77% | -30.86% | -6.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.77% | -30.86% | -6.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.77% | -64.51% | +26.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.30% | -11.27% | -20.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.30% | -32.90% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.79% | 6.20% | +1.59% |
Volatility
FCN vs. CLH - Volatility Comparison
FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) has a higher volatility of 11.27% compared to Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) at 8.50%. This indicates that FCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCN | CLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.27% | 8.50% | +2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.70% | 18.65% | +4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.98% | 26.95% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.02% | 28.61% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.48% | 34.75% | -4.27% |
Dividends
FCN vs. CLH - Dividend Comparison
Neither FCN nor CLH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FCN vs. CLH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTI Consulting, Inc. and Clean Harbors, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FCN vs. CLH - Profitability Comparison
FCN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a gross profit of 306.83M and revenue of 983.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.2%.
CLH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.42M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.
FCN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.92M and revenue of 983.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.
CLH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported an operating income of 118.94M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.
FCN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a net income of 57.63M and revenue of 983.35M, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
CLH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported a net income of 63.20M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FCN and CLH have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCN has higher volatility (11.27%) compared to CLH (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCN dropped -88.02% vs CLH's -93.48%.
CLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCN and CLH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer