FCN vs. HURN

In the year-to-date period, FCN achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly lower than HURN's 15.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FCN has outperformed HURN with an annualized return of 17.41%, while HURN has yielded a comparatively lower 5.71% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FCN Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the HURN Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCN and HURN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FCN nor HURN has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FCN drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, roughly equal to the maximum HURN drawdown of -85.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCN and HURN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) have volatilities of 14.07% and 13.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTI Consulting, Inc. and Huron Consulting Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.