FCN vs. HURN
FCN (FTI Consulting, Inc.) and HURN (Huron Consulting Group Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Consulting Services industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, FCN returned 13.93%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for HURN. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FCN vs. HURN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCN achieves a -6.70% return, which is significantly higher than HURN's -12.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FCN has outperformed HURN with an annualized return of 13.93%, while HURN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.60% annualized return.
FCN
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- YTD
- -6.70%
- 1Y
- -3.71%
- 3Y*
- -3.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 13.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.76%
HURN
- 1D
- -7.32%
- 1M
- 56.21%
- 6M
- -10.20%
- YTD
- -12.23%
- 1Y
- 24.42%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 25.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $68.18M | $59.10M | $79.43M | |
| $74.18M | $49.88M | $38.11M |
FCN vs. HURN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCN FTI Consulting, Inc. | -6.70% | -10.62% | -4.03% | 25.41% | 3.51% | 37.33% | 0.96% | 66.06% | 55.12% | -4.70% |
HURN Huron Consulting Group Inc. | -12.23% | 39.15% | 20.88% | 41.60% | 45.49% | -15.35% | -14.22% | 33.93% | 26.85% | -20.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCN and HURN is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2004 | 0.36 |
The correlation between FCN and HURN shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FCN:
$4.80B
HURN:
$2.41B
FCN:
$10.72
HURN:
$6.66
FCN:
14.87
HURN:
22.80
FCN:
3.24
HURN:
0.87
FCN:
0.96
HURN:
1.46
FCN:
$3.92B
HURN:
$1.81B
FCN:
$1.25B
HURN:
$397.53M
FCN:
$422.82M
HURN:
$209.69M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCN vs. HURN — Risk / Return Rank
FCN
HURN
FCN vs. HURN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCN | HURN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.12 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 0.29 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | 0.60 | -1.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCN vs. HURN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCN drawdown since its inception was -88.02%, roughly equal to the maximum HURN drawdown of -85.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCN and HURN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCN | HURN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.02% | -85.60% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.93% | -51.42% | +26.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.22% | -51.42% | +12.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.22% | -51.42% | +12.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.22% | -53.03% | +13.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.00% | -18.22% | -12.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.31% | -32.32% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.74% | 25.05% | -15.31% |
Volatility
FCN vs. HURN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) is 9.59%, while Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) has a volatility of 37.01%. This indicates that FCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HURN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCN | HURN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 37.01% | -27.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.06% | 52.88% | -27.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.53% | 60.82% | -31.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 40.39% | -10.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.68% | 39.29% | -8.61% |
Dividends
FCN vs. HURN - Dividend Comparison
Neither FCN nor HURN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FCN vs. HURN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTI Consulting, Inc. and Huron Consulting Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FCN vs. HURN - Profitability Comparison
FCN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a gross profit of 316.27M and revenue of 993.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.8%.
HURN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 475.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FCN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported an operating income of 85.56M and revenue of 993.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.
HURN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported an operating income of 50.25M and revenue of 475.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
FCN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a net income of 57.81M and revenue of 993.46M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
HURN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a net income of 31.23M and revenue of 475.04M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FCN and HURN have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HURN has higher volatility (37.01%) compared to FCN (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCN dropped -88.02% vs HURN's -85.60%.
HURN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCN and HURN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer