PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLH vs. MC.PA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CLHMC.PA
YTD Return18.82%7.61%
1Y Return51.86%-8.93%
3Y Return (Ann)32.89%9.64%
5Y Return (Ann)23.64%18.40%
10Y Return (Ann)13.04%21.72%
Sharpe Ratio2.03-0.35
Daily Std Dev25.07%27.35%
Max Drawdown-95.54%-70.25%
Current Drawdown0.00%-11.10%

Fundamentals


CLHMC.PA
Market Cap$11.18B€390.64B
EPS$6.90€30.89
PE Ratio30.0525.32
PEG Ratio188.432.58
Revenue (TTM)$5.48B€86.15B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.62B€54.20B
EBITDA (TTM)$993.03M€25.27B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between CLH and MC.PA is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CLH vs. MC.PA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLH achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly higher than MC.PA's 7.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CLH has underperformed MC.PA with an annualized return of 13.04%, while MC.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 21.72% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


5,000.00%10,000.00%15,000.00%20,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4,444.66%
19,821.28%
CLH
MC.PA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Clean Harbors, Inc.

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLH vs. MC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLH, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.99
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLH, currently valued at 2.75, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.75
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLH, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLH, currently valued at 2.91, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.91
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLH, currently valued at 9.18, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.009.18
MC.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.37, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.35
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.63

CLH vs. MC.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLH Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the MC.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CLH and MC.PA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.99
-0.37
CLH
MC.PA

Dividends

CLH vs. MC.PA - Dividend Comparison

CLH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
1.66%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%3.58%2.26%

Drawdowns

CLH vs. MC.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLH drawdown since its inception was -95.54%, which is greater than MC.PA's maximum drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLH and MC.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay0
-14.51%
CLH
MC.PA

Volatility

CLH vs. MC.PA - Volatility Comparison

Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) has a higher volatility of 9.23% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) at 7.29%. This indicates that CLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MC.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.23%
7.29%
CLH
MC.PA

Financials

CLH vs. MC.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clean Harbors, Inc. and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. CLH values in USD, MC.PA values in EUR