CLH vs. EVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CLH (Clean Harbors, Inc.) is a stock, while EVX (VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index. Over the past 10 years, CLH returned 18.91%/yr vs 12.18%/yr for EVX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

CLH vs. EVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLH achieves a 23.40% return, which is significantly higher than EVX's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CLH has outperformed EVX with an annualized return of 18.91%, while EVX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.18% annualized return.

CLH

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 23.40%
• 6M: 21.07%
• 1Y: 28.02%
• 3Y*: 23.02%
• 5Y*: 26.58%
• 10Y*: 18.91%

EVX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 1.65%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 5.55%
• 3Y*: 9.69%
• 5Y*: 7.63%
• 10Y*: 12.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLH vs. EVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLH Clean Harbors, Inc.	23.40%	1.89%	31.88%	52.92%	14.38%	31.10%	-11.25%	73.76%	-8.95%	-2.61%
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF	4.05%	11.72%	12.99%	12.97%	-10.58%	27.47%	13.28%	28.41%	-3.82%	16.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CLH and EVX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2006	0.55

The correlation between CLH and EVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CLH vs. EVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLH

CLH Risk / Return Rank: 70
CLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CLH Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
CLH Martin Ratio Rank: 74

EVX

EVX Risk / Return Rank: 14
EVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
EVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
EVX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
EVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
EVX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLH vs. EVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLH	EVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	0.41	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	0.65	+0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.08	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	0.51	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.39	1.16	+3.23

CLH vs. EVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLH Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the EVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLH and EVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLH vs. EVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLH drawdown since its inception was -93.48%, which is greater than EVX's maximum drawdown of -55.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLH and EVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLH	EVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.48%	-55.91%	-37.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.45%	-10.85%	-8.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.86%	-19.33%	-11.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.86%	-21.45%	-9.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.51%	-41.01%	-23.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.76%	-6.00%	-1.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.88%	-8.75%	-24.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.39%	4.80%	+1.59%

Volatility

CLH vs. EVX - Volatility Comparison

Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) at 3.96%. This indicates that CLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLH	EVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.75%	3.96%	+3.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.07%	10.06%	+9.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.29%	13.75%	+13.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.61%	17.60%	+11.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.77%	20.26%	+14.51%

Dividends

CLH vs. EVX - Dividend Comparison

CLH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLH Clean Harbors, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF	0.18%	0.19%	0.46%	0.95%	0.41%	0.24%	0.32%	0.38%	0.38%	0.89%	0.70%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLH and EVX in my portfolio?

CLH and EVX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLH or EVX?

CLH has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to EVX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLH dropped -93.48% vs EVX's -55.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.