PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLH vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLH achieves a 23.40% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CLH has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 18.91%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.77% annualized return.


CLH

1D
0.26%
1M
0.85%
YTD
23.40%
6M
21.07%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
26.58%
10Y*
18.91%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLH vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
23.40%1.89%31.88%52.92%14.38%31.10%-11.25%73.76%-8.95%-2.61%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CLH and VOO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.53

The correlation between CLH and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLH vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLH
CLH Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLH Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLH Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLHVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

3.02

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

13.58

-9.19

CLH vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLH Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLH and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLH drawdown since its inception was -93.48%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLH and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLHVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.48%

-33.99%

-59.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.45%

-8.90%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.86%

-18.69%

-12.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.86%

-24.52%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.51%

-33.99%

-30.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.76%

-1.74%

-6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.88%

-3.68%

-29.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.39%

1.98%

+4.41%

Volatility

CLH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that CLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLHVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

4.60%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.07%

9.73%

+9.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.29%

12.39%

+14.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.61%

16.90%

+11.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.77%

18.05%

+16.72%

Dividends

CLH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CLH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLH and VOO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLH has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLH dropped -93.48% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLH and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer