FCN vs. VRSK

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FCN (FTI Consulting, Inc.) and VRSK (Verisk Analytics, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Consulting Services industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, FCN returned 13.66%/yr vs 8.94%/yr for VRSK. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FCN vs. VRSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCN achieves a -10.14% return, which is significantly higher than VRSK's -19.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FCN has outperformed VRSK with an annualized return of 13.66%, while VRSK has yielded a comparatively lower 8.94% annualized return.

FCN

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -11.68%
• YTD: -10.14%
• 6M: -6.64%
• 1Y: -5.23%
• 3Y*: -7.20%
• 5Y*: 2.25%
• 10Y*: 13.66%

VRSK

• 1D: -2.65%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: -19.73%
• 6M: -19.98%
• 1Y: -43.06%
• 3Y*: -6.21%
• 5Y*: 1.50%
• 10Y*: 8.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCN vs. VRSK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCN FTI Consulting, Inc.	-10.14%	-10.62%	-4.03%	25.41%	3.51%	37.33%	0.96%	66.06%	55.12%	-4.70%
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc.	-19.73%	-18.23%	16.00%	36.24%	-22.33%	10.85%	39.89%	37.92%	13.58%	18.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FCN and VRSK is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2009	0.33

Fundamentals

EPS FCN : $10.96 VRSK : $6.56
PE Ratio FCN : 14.00 VRSK : 27.28
PEG Ratio FCN : 2.57 VRSK : 1.49
PS Ratio FCN : 0.96 VRSK : 8.00
Total Revenue (TTM) FCN : $3.87B VRSK : $3.10B
Gross Profit (TTM) FCN : $1.23B VRSK : $2.09B
EBITDA (TTM) FCN : $462.64M VRSK : $1.46B

Return for Risk

FCN vs. VRSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCN

FCN Risk / Return Rank: 28
FCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FCN Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FCN Martin Ratio Rank: 24

VRSK

VRSK Risk / Return Rank: 4
VRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
VRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
VRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2
VRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
VRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCN vs. VRSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCN	VRSK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	-1.37	+1.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	-2.03	+1.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	0.74	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	-0.84	+0.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	-1.37	+0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCN vs. VRSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCN Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is higher than the VRSK Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCN and VRSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCN	VRSK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20	-1.37	+1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.06	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.37	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.54	-0.26

Drawdowns

FCN vs. VRSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCN drawdown since its inception was -88.02%, which is greater than VRSK's maximum drawdown of -50.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCN and VRSK.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCN	VRSK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.02%	-50.81%	-37.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.14%	-50.81%	+27.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.77%	-50.81%	+13.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.77%	-50.81%	+13.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.77%	-50.81%	+13.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.55%	-43.83%	+10.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.29%	-7.18%	-23.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.53%	31.06%	-23.53%

Volatility

FCN vs. VRSK - Volatility Comparison

FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) have volatilities of 11.77% and 12.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCN	VRSK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.77%	12.08%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.58%	25.28%	-2.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.87%	31.48%	-4.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.01%	24.31%	+4.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.47%	24.01%	+6.46%

Dividends

FCN vs. VRSK - Dividend Comparison

FCN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCN FTI Consulting, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc.	1.03%	0.80%	0.57%	0.57%	0.70%	0.51%	0.52%	0.67%

Financials

FCN vs. VRSK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FTI Consulting, Inc. and Verisk Analytics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FCN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a gross profit of 306.83M and revenue of 983.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.2%.

VRSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verisk Analytics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 546.00M and revenue of 782.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.8%.

FCN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.92M and revenue of 983.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.

VRSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verisk Analytics, Inc. reported an operating income of 352.20M and revenue of 782.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.0%.

FCN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a net income of 57.63M and revenue of 983.35M, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.

VRSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verisk Analytics, Inc. reported a net income of 234.20M and revenue of 782.60M, resulting in a net margin of 29.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCN and VRSK in my portfolio?

FCN and VRSK have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCN or VRSK?

VRSK has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to FCN (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCN dropped -88.02% vs VRSK's -50.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.