FCN vs. VRSK
Compare and contrast key facts about FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FCN or VRSK.
Correlation
The correlation between FCN and VRSK is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FCN vs. VRSK - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FCN:
-0.93
VRSK:
1.13
FCN:
-1.05
VRSK:
1.65
FCN:
0.83
VRSK:
1.26
FCN:
-0.72
VRSK:
2.84
FCN:
-1.46
VRSK:
6.00
FCN:
16.77%
VRSK:
4.35%
FCN:
26.90%
VRSK:
21.21%
FCN:
-88.05%
VRSK:
-30.88%
FCN:
-27.77%
VRSK:
-0.11%
Fundamentals
FCN:
$5.72B
VRSK:
$43.30B
FCN:
$7.32
VRSK:
$6.79
FCN:
22.79
VRSK:
45.59
FCN:
1.61
VRSK:
4.15
FCN:
1.56
VRSK:
14.78
FCN:
2.64
VRSK:
349.54
FCN:
$3.67B
VRSK:
$2.93B
FCN:
$1.17B
VRSK:
$1.95B
FCN:
$383.96M
VRSK:
$1.59B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCN achieves a -12.71% return, which is significantly lower than VRSK's 12.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCN having a 15.41% annualized return and VRSK not far ahead at 16.03%.
FCN
-12.71%
0.95%
-14.42%
-25.22%
6.41%
15.41%
VRSK
12.57%
5.65%
10.57%
23.75%
15.12%
16.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FCN vs. VRSK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FCN
VRSK
FCN vs. VRSK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FCN vs. VRSK - Dividend Comparison
FCN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCN FTI Consulting, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.70% | 0.51% | 0.52% | 0.67% |
Drawdowns
FCN vs. VRSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCN drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, which is greater than VRSK's maximum drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCN and VRSK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
FCN vs. VRSK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) is 5.92%, while Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) has a volatility of 7.44%. This indicates that FCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
FCN vs. VRSK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTI Consulting, Inc. and Verisk Analytics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FCN vs. VRSK - Profitability Comparison
FCN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a gross profit of 289.35M and revenue of 898.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.
VRSK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Verisk Analytics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.20M and revenue of 753.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.
FCN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported an operating income of 78.71M and revenue of 898.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.
VRSK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Verisk Analytics, Inc. reported an operating income of 330.10M and revenue of 753.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 43.8%.
FCN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a net income of 61.82M and revenue of 898.28M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.
VRSK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Verisk Analytics, Inc. reported a net income of 232.30M and revenue of 753.00M, resulting in a net margin of 30.9%.