PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FCN vs. VRSK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FCN and VRSK is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

FCN vs. VRSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
360.10%
952.06%
FCN
VRSK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCN:

-0.19

VRSK:

0.90

Sortino Ratio

FCN:

-0.10

VRSK:

1.31

Omega Ratio

FCN:

0.99

VRSK:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

FCN:

-0.28

VRSK:

1.30

Martin Ratio

FCN:

-0.80

VRSK:

3.37

Ulcer Index

FCN:

6.68%

VRSK:

4.99%

Daily Std Dev

FCN:

27.38%

VRSK:

18.68%

Max Drawdown

FCN:

-88.05%

VRSK:

-30.88%

Current Drawdown

FCN:

-16.52%

VRSK:

-6.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FCN:

$7.07B

VRSK:

$39.57B

EPS

FCN:

$8.70

VRSK:

$6.47

PE Ratio

FCN:

22.62

VRSK:

43.31

PEG Ratio

FCN:

1.61

VRSK:

1.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

FCN:

$3.73B

VRSK:

$2.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FCN:

$1.22B

VRSK:

$1.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

FCN:

$448.34M

VRSK:

$1.53B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCN achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than VRSK's 16.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FCN has outperformed VRSK with an annualized return of 17.25%, while VRSK has yielded a comparatively lower 16.07% annualized return.


FCN

YTD

-3.17%

1M

-1.51%

6M

-7.36%

1Y

-4.02%

5Y*

11.30%

10Y*

17.25%

VRSK

YTD

16.05%

1M

-1.58%

6M

2.80%

1Y

18.23%

5Y*

13.74%

10Y*

16.07%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCN vs. VRSK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCN, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.190.90
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCN, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.101.31
The chart of Omega ratio for FCN, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.991.19
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCN, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.281.30
The chart of Martin ratio for FCN, currently valued at -0.80, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-0.803.37
FCN
VRSK

The current FCN Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the VRSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCN and VRSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.19
0.90
FCN
VRSK

Dividends

FCN vs. VRSK - Dividend Comparison

FCN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.


TTM20232022202120202019
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
0.57%0.57%0.70%0.51%0.52%0.67%

Drawdowns

FCN vs. VRSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCN drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, which is greater than VRSK's maximum drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCN and VRSK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-16.52%
-6.38%
FCN
VRSK

Volatility

FCN vs. VRSK - Volatility Comparison

FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) at 3.82%. This indicates that FCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.33%
3.82%
FCN
VRSK

Financials

FCN vs. VRSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTI Consulting, Inc. and Verisk Analytics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab