FCN vs. VRSK
Compare and contrast key facts about FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FCN or VRSK.
Performance
FCN vs. VRSK - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCN achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly lower than VRSK's 18.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCN having a 17.38% annualized return and VRSK not far behind at 16.64%.
FCN
-2.10%
-14.65%
-12.61%
-11.01%
12.54%
17.38%
VRSK
18.10%
3.77%
11.93%
18.91%
15.50%
16.64%
Fundamentals
| FCN | VRSK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.26B | $40.66B |
| EPS | $8.71 | $6.47 |
| PE Ratio | 23.19 | 44.50 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.61 | 1.86 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $3.73B | $2.82B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.22B | $1.77B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $449.25M | $1.51B |
Key characteristics
| FCN | VRSK | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.38 | 0.96 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.38 | 1.37 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.94 | 1.21 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.57 | 1.46 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.19 | 3.67 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.19% | 5.12% |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.58% | 19.50% |
| Max Drawdown | -88.05% | -30.88% |
| Current Drawdown | -15.60% | -3.19% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between FCN and VRSK is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FCN vs. VRSK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FCN vs. VRSK - Dividend Comparison
FCN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCN FTI Consulting, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 0.54% | 0.57% | 0.70% | 0.51% | 0.52% | 0.67% |
Drawdowns
FCN vs. VRSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCN drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, which is greater than VRSK's maximum drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCN and VRSK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FCN vs. VRSK - Volatility Comparison
FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) has a higher volatility of 14.02% compared to Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) at 5.70%. This indicates that FCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FCN vs. VRSK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTI Consulting, Inc. and Verisk Analytics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities