CLH vs. WM
CLH (Clean Harbors, Inc.) and WM (Waste Management, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Waste Management industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, CLH returned 18.91%/yr vs 14.90%/yr for WM. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLH vs. WM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLH achieves a 23.40% return, which is significantly higher than WM's -2.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CLH has outperformed WM with an annualized return of 18.91%, while WM has yielded a comparatively lower 14.90% annualized return.
CLH
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 23.40%
- 6M
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 23.02%
- 5Y*
- 26.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.91%
WM
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- -2.10%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- -6.56%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 14.90%
CLH vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 23.40% | 1.89% | 31.88% | 52.92% | 14.38% | 31.10% | -11.25% | 73.76% | -8.95% | -2.61% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | -2.10% | 10.50% | 14.28% | 16.20% | -4.49% | 43.82% | 5.46% | 30.45% | 5.32% | 24.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLH and WM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1991 | 0.22 |
The correlation between CLH and WM shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLH:
$15.33B
WM:
$86.26B
CLH:
$7.40
WM:
$6.91
CLH:
39.12
WM:
30.87
CLH:
1.56
WM:
2.53
CLH:
2.55
WM:
3.39
CLH:
5.52
WM:
8.61
CLH:
$6.06B
WM:
$25.41B
CLH:
$1.81B
WM:
$5.61B
CLH:
$1.07B
WM:
$6.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLH vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank
CLH
WM
CLH vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLH | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.96 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | -0.39 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | -0.85 | +5.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLH vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLH drawdown since its inception was -93.48%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLH and WM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLH | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.48% | -77.85% | -15.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.45% | -16.70% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.86% | -18.14% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.86% | -18.14% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.51% | -30.07% | -34.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.76% | -12.75% | +4.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.88% | -17.68% | -15.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.39% | 7.70% | -1.31% |
Volatility
CLH vs. WM - Volatility Comparison
Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 6.07%. This indicates that CLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLH | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 6.07% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.07% | 14.00% | +5.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.29% | 19.10% | +8.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.61% | 18.62% | +9.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.77% | 19.55% | +15.22% |
Dividends
CLH vs. WM - Dividend Comparison
CLH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.66% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% |
Financials
CLH vs. WM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clean Harbors, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLH vs. WM - Profitability Comparison
CLH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.42M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.
WM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CLH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported an operating income of 118.94M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.
WM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.11B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
CLH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported a net income of 63.20M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
WM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 723.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLH and WM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLH has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to WM (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLH dropped -93.48% vs WM's -77.85%.
CLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLH and WM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer