PortfoliosLab logo
FCN vs. BAH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FCN and BAH is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FCN vs. BAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCN:

-0.93

BAH:

-0.42

Sortino Ratio

FCN:

-1.05

BAH:

-0.29

Omega Ratio

FCN:

0.83

BAH:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

FCN:

-0.72

BAH:

-0.28

Martin Ratio

FCN:

-1.46

BAH:

-0.52

Ulcer Index

FCN:

16.77%

BAH:

23.76%

Daily Std Dev

FCN:

26.90%

BAH:

34.01%

Max Drawdown

FCN:

-88.05%

BAH:

-44.33%

Current Drawdown

FCN:

-27.77%

BAH:

-30.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FCN:

$5.72B

BAH:

$15.84B

EPS

FCN:

$7.32

BAH:

$6.70

PE Ratio

FCN:

22.79

BAH:

19.06

PEG Ratio

FCN:

1.61

BAH:

2.29

PS Ratio

FCN:

1.56

BAH:

1.34

PB Ratio

FCN:

2.64

BAH:

13.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

FCN:

$3.67B

BAH:

$9.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FCN:

$1.17B

BAH:

$4.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

FCN:

$383.96M

BAH:

$1.24B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCN achieves a -12.71% return, which is significantly lower than BAH's 0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FCN has underperformed BAH with an annualized return of 15.35%, while BAH has yielded a comparatively higher 18.30% annualized return.


FCN

YTD

-12.71%

1M

1.81%

6M

-14.42%

1Y

-24.79%

5Y*

7.76%

10Y*

15.35%

BAH

YTD

0.55%

1M

15.74%

6M

-13.37%

1Y

-14.30%

5Y*

14.65%

10Y*

18.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCN vs. BAH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCN is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCN is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCN is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCN is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCN is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCN is 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BAH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAH is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAH is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAH is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAH is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAH is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAH is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCN vs. BAH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FCN Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the BAH Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCN and BAH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FCN vs. BAH - Dividend Comparison

FCN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
1.61%1.59%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%9.16%

Drawdowns

FCN vs. BAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCN drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, which is greater than BAH's maximum drawdown of -44.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCN and BAH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FCN vs. BAH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) is 5.92%, while Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that FCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FCN vs. BAH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTI Consulting, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
898.28M
2.92B
(FCN) Total Revenue
(BAH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FCN vs. BAH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FTI Consulting, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20212022202320242025
32.2%
55.2%
(FCN) Gross Margin
(BAH) Gross Margin
FCN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a gross profit of 289.35M and revenue of 898.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.

BAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.61B and revenue of 2.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

FCN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported an operating income of 78.71M and revenue of 898.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

BAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 291.26M and revenue of 2.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

FCN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a net income of 61.82M and revenue of 898.28M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.

BAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 186.95M and revenue of 2.92B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.