FCG vs. EQT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and EQT Corporation (EQT).

FCG is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007.

Performance

FCG vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FCG vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF	31.44%	-2.28%	4.16%	2.55%	47.24%	98.49%	-23.20%	-15.76%	-34.81%	-11.38%
EQT EQT Corporation	14.30%	17.64%	21.41%	16.20%	57.64%	71.60%	17.27%	-41.82%	-38.82%	-12.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCG achieves a 31.44% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's 14.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FCG has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 6.95%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.24% annualized return.

FCG

• 1D: -3.34%
• 1M: 7.40%
• YTD: 31.44%
• 6M: 29.47%
• 1Y: 25.85%
• 3Y*: 13.93%
• 5Y*: 21.20%
• 10Y*: 6.95%

EQT

• 1D: -4.01%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 14.30%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 14.72%
• 3Y*: 26.02%
• 5Y*: 28.03%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FCG vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCG

FCG Risk / Return Rank: 39
FCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FCG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FCG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

EQT

EQT Risk / Return Rank: 54
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCG vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCG	EQT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	0.41	+0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	0.76	+0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.10	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	0.85	+0.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.25	1.68	+1.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCG vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCG and EQT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCG	EQT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	0.41	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.64	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	0.13	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.31	-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between FCG and EQT is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FCG vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

FCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than EQT's 1.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF	2.09%	2.86%	2.76%	3.25%	3.04%	1.73%	3.82%	2.87%	1.46%	1.56%	1.70%	4.79%
EQT EQT Corporation	1.06%	1.19%	1.37%	1.57%	1.63%	0.00%	0.24%	1.10%	0.42%	0.21%	0.18%	0.23%

Drawdowns

FCG vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCG drawdown since its inception was -97.20%, which is greater than EQT's maximum drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCG and EQT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCG	EQT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.20%	-91.51%	-5.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.23%	-18.39%	-4.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.33%	-42.56%	+9.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.04%	-88.28%	+3.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.50%	-10.07%	-63.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.30%	-23.37%	-41.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.14%	9.31%	-1.17%

Volatility

FCG vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) is 7.21%, while EQT Corporation (EQT) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that FCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCG	EQT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.21%	9.09%	-1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.62%	24.01%	-5.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.59%	36.12%	-3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.84%	43.81%	-9.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.29%	48.96%	-10.67%