PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FCG vs. UNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FCGUNG
YTD Return5.13%-38.21%
1Y Return5.58%-50.59%
3Y Return (Ann)12.66%-42.68%
5Y Return (Ann)20.82%-32.36%
10Y Return (Ann)-8.18%-28.44%
Sharpe Ratio0.23-0.92
Sortino Ratio0.46-1.39
Omega Ratio1.060.85
Calmar Ratio0.06-0.52
Martin Ratio0.64-1.32
Ulcer Index7.87%39.47%
Daily Std Dev22.07%56.39%
Max Drawdown-97.20%-99.85%
Current Drawdown-79.17%-99.85%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between FCG and UNG is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FCG vs. UNG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FCG achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly higher than UNG's -38.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FCG has outperformed UNG with an annualized return of -8.18%, while UNG has yielded a comparatively lower -28.44% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.14%
-26.92%
FCG
UNG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCG vs. UNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UNG's 1.28% expense ratio.


UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
Expense ratio chart for UNG: current value at 1.28% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.28%
Expense ratio chart for FCG: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCG vs. UNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCG, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCG, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.46
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FCG, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCG, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FCG, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.000.64
UNG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UNG, currently valued at -0.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UNG, currently valued at -1.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00-1.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UNG, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.000.85
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UNG, currently valued at -0.52, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.52
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UNG, currently valued at -1.32, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00-1.32

FCG vs. UNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the UNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCG and UNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.23
-0.92
FCG
UNG

Dividends

FCG vs. UNG - Dividend Comparison

FCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, while UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
3.11%3.25%3.04%1.73%3.83%2.88%1.46%1.56%1.69%4.82%1.34%0.35%
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCG vs. UNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCG drawdown since its inception was -97.20%, roughly equal to the maximum UNG drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCG and UNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-95.00%-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-79.17%
-99.85%
FCG
UNG

Volatility

FCG vs. UNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) is 7.67%, while United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a volatility of 14.55%. This indicates that FCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.67%
14.55%
FCG
UNG