PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCFS vs. C
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FCFS vs. C - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and Citigroup Inc. (C). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFS achieves a 41.69% return, which is significantly higher than C's 21.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFS has outperformed C with an annualized return of 18.69%, while C has yielded a comparatively lower 16.22% annualized return.


FCFS

1D
2.97%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
41.69%
6M
37.77%
1Y
74.51%
3Y*
35.01%
5Y*
23.68%
10Y*
18.69%

C

1D
1.27%
1M
13.30%
YTD
21.02%
6M
26.32%
1Y
87.27%
3Y*
46.87%
5Y*
16.80%
10Y*
16.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFS vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCFS
FirstCash, Inc.
41.69%55.68%-3.20%26.45%18.03%8.47%-11.74%12.72%8.48%45.56%
C
Citigroup Inc.
21.02%70.38%41.93%18.98%-22.09%0.93%-19.70%57.82%-28.49%27.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFS and C is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 1992

0.25

The correlation between FCFS and C shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.39 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

FCFS:

$10.56

C:

$8.65

PE Ratio

FCFS:

21.29

C:

16.17

PS Ratio

FCFS:

1.95

C:

1.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

FCFS:

$3.88B

C:

$171.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FCFS:

$2.47B

C:

$77.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

FCFS:

$957.95M

C:

$24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCFS vs. C — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFS
FCFS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FCFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFS vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCFSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.45

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.76

5.64

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.99

16.25

+7.75

FCFS vs. C - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFS Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the C Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFS and C, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCFS vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFS drawdown since its inception was -90.26%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFS and C.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCFSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.26%

-98.00%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-14.76%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.38%

-31.31%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.70%

-44.31%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.16%

-56.51%

+6.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-62.68%

+59.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-43.51%

+19.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

5.12%

-2.06%

Volatility

FCFS vs. C - Volatility Comparison

FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) has a higher volatility of 12.65% compared to Citigroup Inc. (C) at 8.30%. This indicates that FCFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCFSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.65%

8.30%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.52%

23.09%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.63%

28.37%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.63%

29.20%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.64%

33.23%

-2.59%

Dividends

FCFS vs. C - Dividend Comparison

FCFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than C's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.72%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%
FCFS
FirstCash, Inc.
0.75%1.00%1.41%1.25%1.45%1.56%1.54%1.27%1.26%1.14%1.20%0.00%

Financials

FCFS vs. C - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FirstCash, Inc. and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
1.05B
44.14B
(FCFS) Total Revenue
(C) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FCFS vs. C - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FirstCash, Inc. and Citigroup Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
99.9%
49.3%
Portfolio components
FCFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FirstCash, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.9%.

C - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.76B and revenue of 44.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

FCFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FirstCash, Inc. reported an operating income of 781.38M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 74.3%.

C - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 7.52B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

FCFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FirstCash, Inc. reported a net income of 107.70M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.

C - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.79B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FCFS and C have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCFS has higher volatility (12.65%) compared to C (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFS dropped -90.26% vs C's -98.00%.

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCFS and C

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer