PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C vs. TFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

C vs. TFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Citigroup Inc. (C) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C achieves a 12.46% return, which is significantly higher than TFC's -1.64% return. Over the past 10 years, C has outperformed TFC with an annualized return of 14.47%, while TFC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.93% annualized return.


C

1D
-1.01%
1M
3.42%
YTD
12.46%
6M
22.96%
1Y
73.63%
3Y*
45.73%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
14.47%

TFC

1D
-1.45%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
-1.64%
6M
2.08%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
6.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C vs. TFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C
Citigroup Inc.
12.46%70.38%41.93%18.98%-22.09%0.93%-19.70%57.82%-28.49%27.03%
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
-1.64%19.05%23.72%-8.59%-23.53%26.08%-11.16%34.55%-10.24%8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between C and TFC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.58

The correlation between C and TFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.72 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

C:

$230.76B

TFC:

$60.06B

EPS

C:

$8.65

TFC:

$4.28

PE Ratio

C:

15.02

TFC:

11.07

PS Ratio

C:

1.40

TFC:

2.01

PB Ratio

C:

1.21

TFC:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

C:

$171.19B

TFC:

$30.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

C:

$77.85B

TFC:

$19.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

C:

$24.12B

TFC:

$6.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C vs. TFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

TFC
TFC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C vs. TFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citigroup Inc. (C) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.20

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

1.22

+3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

3.26

+11.18

C vs. TFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the TFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C and TFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

1.10

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.00

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.21

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.28

-0.13

Drawdowns

C vs. TFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than TFC's maximum drawdown of -66.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C and TFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.00%

-66.56%

-31.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.76%

-20.67%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.31%

-26.93%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.56%

-59.11%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.51%

-59.11%

+2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.32%

-13.27%

-52.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.50%

-13.84%

-29.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.11%

7.71%

-2.60%

Volatility

C vs. TFC - Volatility Comparison

Citigroup Inc. (C) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) have volatilities of 7.44% and 7.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

7.29%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.66%

17.12%

+5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.86%

23.04%

+4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.11%

31.86%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.20%

33.60%

-0.40%

Dividends

C vs. TFC - Dividend Comparison

C's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than TFC's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.85%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
4.39%4.23%4.79%5.63%4.65%3.18%3.76%3.04%3.60%2.53%2.45%2.78%

Financials

C vs. TFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citigroup Inc. and Truist Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
44.14B
7.41B
(C) Total Revenue
(TFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

C vs. TFC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Citigroup Inc. and Truist Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
49.3%
63.1%
Portfolio components
C - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.76B and revenue of 44.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

TFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.67B and revenue of 7.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.1%.

C - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 7.52B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

TFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.69B and revenue of 7.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.8%.

C - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.79B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.

TFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 7.41B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


C and TFC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

C has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to TFC (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, C dropped -98.00% vs TFC's -66.56%.

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C and TFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer