FCA vs. CIBR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR).

FCA and CIBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCA is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2011. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. Both FCA and CIBR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FCA vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FCA vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund	10.86%	45.20%	14.07%	-8.28%	-17.61%	-0.65%	11.80%	18.72%	-18.30%	60.26%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	-12.12%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCA achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's -12.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FCA has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 9.40%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.52% annualized return.

FCA

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -7.82%
• YTD: 10.86%
• 6M: 8.68%
• 1Y: 53.93%
• 3Y*: 17.99%
• 5Y*: 5.95%
• 10Y*: 9.40%

CIBR

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: -12.12%
• 6M: -17.17%
• 1Y: 0.06%
• 3Y*: 14.11%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 14.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCA vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

FCA

First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund

CIBR

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF

Return for Risk

FCA vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCA

FCA Risk / Return Rank: 92
FCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FCA Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FCA Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 12
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 13
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCA vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCA	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	0.00	+2.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	0.17	+2.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.02	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	-0.03	+3.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.08	-0.07	+15.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCA vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCA Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCA and CIBR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCA	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	0.00	+2.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.36	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.63	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.51	-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between FCA and CIBR is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FCA vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than CIBR's 0.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund	2.32%	2.67%	5.17%	5.70%	6.00%	4.91%	4.12%	3.73%	3.10%	2.30%	2.51%	4.13%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.65%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%

Drawdowns

FCA vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCA drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCA and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCA	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.56%	-33.89%	-11.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.81%	-21.96%	+6.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.47%	-33.89%	-8.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.47%	-33.89%	-8.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.75%	-19.50%	+10.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.81%	-8.66%	-13.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	8.02%	-4.52%

Volatility

FCA vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 7.04%. This indicates that FCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCA	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.25%	7.04%	+1.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.57%	16.45%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.19%	24.46%	+1.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.43%	24.21%	+3.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.57%	23.22%	+3.35%