FCA vs. DIVO
FCA (First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCA is a China Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. FCA is passively managed, while DIVO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCA returned 5.02%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for DIVO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCA charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
FCA vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCA achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than DIVO's 6.11% return.
FCA
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 44.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
DIVO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 6.82%
- 1Y
- 19.19%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- —
FCA vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund | 11.53% | 45.20% | 14.07% | -8.28% | -17.61% | -0.65% | 11.80% | 18.72% | -18.30% | 60.26% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.11% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCA and DIVO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016 | 0.33 |
FCA vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCA
DIVO
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
FCA
DIVO
Financial Services
FCA
DIVO
Basic Materials
FCA
DIVO
Energy
FCA
DIVO
Technology
FCA
DIVO
Healthcare
FCA
DIVO
Communication Services
FCA
DIVO
Utilities
FCA
DIVO
Real Estate
FCA
DIVO
-
Consumer Cyclical
FCA
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
FCA
DIVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCA vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
FCA
DIVO
FCA vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCA | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 2.15 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.58 | 3.19 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 3.37 | +0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.06 | 12.19 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCA | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.15 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.91 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.85 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
FCA vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCA drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCA and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCA | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -30.04% | -15.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -5.95% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.13% | -12.12% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.47% | -13.72% | -28.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -0.28% | -8.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.62% | -2.61% | -19.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 1.64% | +2.23% |
Volatility
FCA vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.23%. This indicates that FCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCA | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 2.23% | +6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | 6.94% | +9.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.31% | 8.97% | +13.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.59% | 11.93% | +15.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 14.84% | +11.79% |
FCA vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCA vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
FCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than DIVO's 6.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.38% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund | 2.31% | 2.67% | 5.17% | 5.70% | 6.00% | 4.91% | 4.12% | 3.73% | 3.10% | 2.30% | 2.51% | 4.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCA and DIVO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCA has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to DIVO (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCA dropped -45.56% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.81% vs 5.02% for FCA. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FCA.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.38%, compared with 2.31% for FCA.
FCA is categorized as China Equities, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FCA and 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCA and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer