PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FCA vs. KLIP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FCA and KLIP is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

FCA vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.71%
1.62%
FCA
KLIP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCA:

0.56

KLIP:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

FCA:

0.98

KLIP:

0.75

Omega Ratio

FCA:

1.13

KLIP:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

FCA:

0.42

KLIP:

0.81

Martin Ratio

FCA:

1.80

KLIP:

1.70

Ulcer Index

FCA:

9.95%

KLIP:

4.56%

Daily Std Dev

FCA:

32.19%

KLIP:

17.48%

Max Drawdown

FCA:

-45.55%

KLIP:

-10.39%

Current Drawdown

FCA:

-28.03%

KLIP:

-2.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCA achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's 4.60% return.


FCA

YTD

13.06%

1M

0.56%

6M

1.29%

1Y

17.05%

5Y*

-0.37%

10Y*

3.23%

KLIP

YTD

4.60%

1M

3.23%

6M

1.83%

1Y

4.87%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCA vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.


KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
Expense ratio chart for KLIP: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for FCA: current value at 0.80% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.80%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCA vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCA, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.610.44
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCA, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.040.75
The chart of Omega ratio for FCA, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.141.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCA, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.770.81
The chart of Martin ratio for FCA, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.961.70
FCA
KLIP

The current FCA Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCA and KLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.61
0.44
FCA
KLIP

Dividends

FCA vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

FCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than KLIP's 56.18% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
5.22%5.71%6.00%4.91%4.12%3.73%3.10%2.30%2.51%4.13%2.47%2.86%
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
56.18%61.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCA vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCA drawdown since its inception was -45.55%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -10.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCA and KLIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-17.50%
-2.21%
FCA
KLIP

Volatility

FCA vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) has a higher volatility of 9.40% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 5.62%. This indicates that FCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
9.40%
5.62%
FCA
KLIP
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab