FCA vs. KLIP
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP).
FCA and KLIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCA is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2011. KLIP is managed by CICC. It was launched on Jan 12, 2023.
Performance
FCA vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCA vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund | 10.86% | 45.20% | 14.07% | -14.65% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | -8.98% | 16.92% | 3.37% | 10.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCA achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -8.98% return.
FCA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- 1Y
- 53.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
KLIP
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- -8.98%
- 6M
- -12.63%
- 1Y
- -1.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCA vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCA vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank
FCA
KLIP
FCA vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCA | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | -0.06 | +2.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.56 | 0.05 | +2.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.01 | +0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | -0.08 | +3.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.08 | -0.26 | +15.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCA | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | -0.06 | +2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.35 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCA and KLIP is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCA vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison
FCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than KLIP's 28.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund | 2.32% | 2.67% | 5.17% | 5.70% | 6.00% | 4.91% | 4.12% | 3.73% | 3.10% | 2.30% | 2.51% | 4.13% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 28.24% | 25.14% | 54.26% | 61.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCA vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCA drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCA and KLIP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCA | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -18.61% | -26.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.81% | -17.23% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.75% | -14.21% | +5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.81% | -3.34% | -18.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 5.18% | -1.68% |
Volatility
FCA vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 7.16%. This indicates that FCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCA | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 7.16% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | 13.48% | +3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.19% | 19.76% | +6.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 18.19% | +9.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.57% | 18.19% | +8.38% |