FBL vs. NUKZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) and NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. FBL is actively managed, while NUKZ is passively managed. Over the past year, FBL returned -46.30% vs 27.91% for NUKZ. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NUKZ.

Performance

FBL vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a -34.05% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 7.57% return.

FBL

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -17.09%
• YTD: -34.05%
• 6M: -31.11%
• 1Y: -46.30%
• 3Y*: 25.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NUKZ

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: -5.07%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 4.81%
• 1Y: 27.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBL vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	-34.05%	0.50%	88.39%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	7.57%	56.57%	60.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FBL and NUKZ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024	0.43

FBL vs. NUKZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FBL	NUKZ
Communication Services	66.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	12.9%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	45.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	1.4%
Utilities	-	35.8%

Return for Risk

FBL vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBL

FBL Risk / Return Rank: 4
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 31
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 27
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBL vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBL	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	0.92	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.73	1.43	-2.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.17	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	1.70	-2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	4.11	-5.48

FBL vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBL and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBL vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and NUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBL	NUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.15%	-33.03%	-28.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.03%	-16.51%	-44.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.26%	-10.39%	-46.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.70%	-6.06%	-10.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.98%	6.80%	+27.18%

Volatility

FBL vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a higher volatility of 20.60% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 11.24%. This indicates that FBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBL	NUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.60%	11.24%	+9.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.92%	23.34%	+30.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.02%	30.46%	+40.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.08%	32.94%	+38.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.08%	32.94%	+38.14%

FBL vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBL vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than NUKZ's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	3.14%	2.07%	0.00%	51.58%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.85%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBL and NUKZ in my portfolio?

FBL and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBL or NUKZ?

FBL has higher volatility (20.60%) compared to NUKZ (11.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBL dropped -61.15% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

Which ETF is better, FBL or NUKZ?

On 1-year performance, NUKZ leads with 27.91% vs -46.30% for FBL. On fees, NUKZ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, NUKZ has been the lower-risk option at 11.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBL or NUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, NUKZ has performed better with a 27.91% return vs -46.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBL or NUKZ?

NUKZ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for FBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBL or NUKZ?

FBL has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between FBL and NUKZ?

FBL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUKZ is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for FBL and 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.