FBL vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBL returned -33.72% vs 282.56% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. FBL charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

FBL vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a -14.12% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -23.27% return.

FBL

• 1D: -3.69%
• 1M: 30.22%
• 6M: -8.94%
• YTD: -14.12%
• 1Y: -33.72%
• 3Y*: 28.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 46.38%
• 6M: -9.68%
• YTD: -23.27%
• 1Y: 282.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBL vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	-14.12%	0.50%	14.62%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-23.27%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FBL and MSTZ is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.28

Return for Risk

FBL vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBL

FBL Risk / Return Rank: 6
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBL vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBL	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.44	1.92	-2.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	2.45	-2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.32	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.55	3.35	-3.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.91	6.53	-7.44

FBL vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBL and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBL vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBL	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.15%	-99.38%	+38.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.03%	-84.89%	+23.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.34%	-97.39%	+53.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.49%	-94.53%	+77.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.05%	43.51%	-6.46%

Volatility

FBL vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) is 31.85%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that FBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBL	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.85%	56.56%	-24.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.90%	135.11%	-73.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.12%	148.53%	-71.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.36%	171.02%	-98.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.36%	171.02%	-98.66%

FBL vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBL has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBL vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	2.41%	2.07%	0.00%	51.58%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBL and MSTZ in my portfolio?

FBL and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBL or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to FBL (31.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBL dropped -61.15% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, FBL or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs -33.72% for FBL. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, FBL has been the lower-risk option at 31.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBL or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs -33.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBL or MSTZ?

MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for FBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBL or MSTZ?

FBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between FBL and MSTZ?

FBL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for FBL and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.