FANG vs. SYF
FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) and SYF (Synchrony Financial) are both stocks. FANG operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while SYF operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, FANG returned 11.22%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for SYF. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FANG vs. SYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 31.46% return, which is significantly higher than SYF's -11.29% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has underperformed SYF with an annualized return of 11.22%, while SYF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.
FANG
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 30.64%
- YTD
- 31.46%
- 1Y
- 41.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 24.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.34%
SYF
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -7.71%
- YTD
- -11.29%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- 31.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.35%
FANG vs. SYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 31.46% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
SYF Synchrony Financial | -11.29% | 30.64% | 74.01% | 19.76% | -27.43% | 36.40% | -0.08% | 57.48% | -37.84% | 8.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FANG and SYF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2014 | 0.34 |
The correlation between FANG and SYF shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FANG:
$54.96B
SYF:
$24.69B
FANG:
$1.41
SYF:
$9.97
FANG:
138.71
SYF:
7.36
FANG:
3.68
SYF:
1.33
FANG:
1.51
SYF:
1.67
FANG:
$15.19B
SYF:
$19.92B
FANG:
$7.30B
SYF:
$12.16B
FANG:
$5.54B
SYF:
$4.94B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FANG vs. SYF — Risk / Return Rank
FANG
SYF
FANG vs. SYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Synchrony Financial (SYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FANG | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.07 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 0.24 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.27 | 0.49 | +5.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FANG vs. SYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than SYF's maximum drawdown of -66.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and SYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FANG | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.72% | -66.37% | -22.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.09% | -27.61% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.10% | -37.75% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.10% | -46.65% | +4.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.72% | -66.37% | -22.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.07% | -16.35% | +8.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.33% | -16.97% | -2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 13.29% | -6.61% |
Volatility
FANG vs. SYF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) is 9.53%, while Synchrony Financial (SYF) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that FANG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FANG | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.53% | 12.90% | -3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.42% | 24.71% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.08% | 31.26% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.38% | 36.88% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.05% | 39.39% | +9.66% |
Dividends
FANG vs. SYF - Dividend Comparison
FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than SYF's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.12% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SYF Synchrony Financial | 1.63% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 2.51% | 2.74% | 1.90% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 3.07% | 1.45% | 0.72% |
Financials
FANG vs. SYF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Synchrony Financial. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FANG vs. SYF - Profitability Comparison
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.
SYF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Synchrony Financial reported a gross profit of 4.64B and revenue of 5.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.7%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
SYF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Synchrony Financial reported an operating income of 914.00M and revenue of 5.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
SYF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Synchrony Financial reported a net income of 805.00M and revenue of 5.60B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FANG and SYF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SYF has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to FANG (9.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FANG dropped -88.72% vs SYF's -66.37%.
FANG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FANG and SYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer