FANG vs. STLD
FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) and STLD (Steel Dynamics, Inc.) are both stocks. FANG operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while STLD operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, FANG returned 10.83%/yr vs 29.92%/yr for STLD. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FANG vs. STLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 29.28% return, which is significantly lower than STLD's 67.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has underperformed STLD with an annualized return of 10.83%, while STLD has yielded a comparatively higher 29.92% annualized return.
FANG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 29.28%
- 6M
- 24.04%
- 1Y
- 31.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 22.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
STLD
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 67.39%
- 6M
- 65.42%
- 1Y
- 117.36%
- 3Y*
- 40.23%
- 5Y*
- 36.27%
- 10Y*
- 29.92%
FANG vs. STLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 29.28% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 67.39% | 50.70% | -1.99% | 22.75% | 60.14% | 71.42% | 12.46% | 16.78% | -29.02% | 23.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between FANG and STLD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2012 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FANG and STLD has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FANG:
$54.33B
STLD:
$40.94B
FANG:
$1.40
STLD:
$9.33
FANG:
137.12
STLD:
30.30
FANG:
3.64
STLD:
2.19
FANG:
1.49
STLD:
4.47
FANG:
$15.19B
STLD:
$19.01B
FANG:
$7.30B
STLD:
$2.66B
FANG:
$5.54B
STLD:
$2.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FANG vs. STLD — Risk / Return Rank
FANG
STLD
FANG vs. STLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FANG | STLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.50 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 5.81 | -3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 19.49 | -14.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FANG vs. STLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, roughly equal to the maximum STLD drawdown of -87.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and STLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FANG | STLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.72% | -87.05% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -20.33% | +7.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.10% | -28.66% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.10% | -32.20% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.72% | -68.46% | -20.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.59% | 0.00% | -9.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.37% | -33.27% | +13.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.43% | 6.04% | +0.39% |
Volatility
FANG vs. STLD - Volatility Comparison
Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) at 9.70%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FANG | STLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | 9.70% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.10% | 24.96% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.48% | 33.38% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.99% | 38.03% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.05% | 39.31% | +9.74% |
Dividends
FANG vs. STLD - Dividend Comparison
FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than STLD's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.16% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 0.72% | 1.18% | 1.61% | 1.44% | 1.39% | 1.68% | 2.71% | 2.82% | 2.50% | 1.44% | 1.57% | 3.08% |
Financials
FANG vs. STLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Steel Dynamics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FANG vs. STLD - Profitability Comparison
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.
STLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 763.22M and revenue of 5.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.7%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
STLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of 538.00M and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
STLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a net income of 403.44M and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FANG and STLD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FANG has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to STLD (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FANG dropped -88.72% vs STLD's -87.05%.
STLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FANG and STLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer