STLD vs. CMC
STLD (Steel Dynamics, Inc.) and CMC (Commercial Metals Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Steel industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, STLD returned 26.20%/yr vs 15.68%/yr for CMC. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
STLD vs. CMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLD achieves a 38.92% return, which is significantly higher than CMC's -7.20% return. Over the past 10 years, STLD has outperformed CMC with an annualized return of 26.20%, while CMC has yielded a comparatively lower 15.68% annualized return.
STLD
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- -17.01%
- 6M
- 39.00%
- YTD
- 38.92%
- 1Y
- 75.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.91%
- 5Y*
- 32.77%
- 10Y*
- 26.20%
CMC
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -17.85%
- 6M
- -11.99%
- YTD
- -7.20%
- 1Y
- 23.64%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.68%
STLD vs. CMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 38.92% | 50.70% | -1.99% | 22.75% | 60.14% | 71.42% | 12.46% | 16.78% | -29.02% | 23.34% |
CMC Commercial Metals Company | -7.20% | 41.52% | 0.41% | 4.99% | 35.05% | 79.83% | -5.45% | 42.81% | -23.17% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between STLD and CMC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 1996 | 0.62 |
The correlation between STLD and CMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STLD:
$33.77B
CMC:
$7.04B
STLD:
$9.38
CMC:
$5.30
STLD:
24.95
CMC:
12.01
STLD:
1.80
CMC:
0.81
STLD:
3.70
CMC:
1.57
STLD:
$19.01B
CMC:
$8.85B
STLD:
$2.66B
CMC:
$392.81M
STLD:
$2.23B
CMC:
$865.35M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STLD vs. CMC — Risk / Return Rank
STLD
CMC
STLD vs. CMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STLD | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.13 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 0.79 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.56 | 1.99 | +8.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STLD vs. CMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLD drawdown since its inception was -87.05%, roughly equal to the maximum CMC drawdown of -83.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLD and CMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STLD | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.05% | -83.77% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.88% | -29.96% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.66% | -37.63% | +8.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.20% | -37.63% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.46% | -53.78% | -14.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.01% | -22.98% | +5.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.22% | -23.50% | -9.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 11.90% | -4.69% |
Volatility
STLD vs. CMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) is 14.05%, while Commercial Metals Company (CMC) has a volatility of 15.08%. This indicates that STLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STLD | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.05% | 15.08% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.63% | 27.43% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.40% | 36.36% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.15% | 35.92% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.41% | 39.88% | -0.47% |
Dividends
STLD vs. CMC - Dividend Comparison
STLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than CMC's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMC Commercial Metals Company | 1.19% | 1.04% | 1.41% | 1.28% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 2.34% | 2.16% | 3.00% | 2.25% | 2.20% | 3.51% |
STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 0.88% | 1.18% | 1.61% | 1.44% | 1.39% | 1.68% | 2.71% | 2.82% | 2.50% | 1.44% | 1.57% | 3.08% |
Financials
STLD vs. CMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Steel Dynamics, Inc. and Commercial Metals Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STLD vs. CMC - Profitability Comparison
STLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 763.22M and revenue of 5.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.7%.
CMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a gross profit of -795.04M and revenue of 2.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -32.0%.
STLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of 538.00M and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.
CMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported an operating income of -366.25M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in an operating margin of -14.8%.
STLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a net income of 403.44M and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
CMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a net income of 173.02M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STLD and CMC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMC has higher volatility (15.08%) compared to STLD (14.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLD dropped -87.05% vs CMC's -83.77%.
STLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STLD and CMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer