PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
STLD vs. CLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


STLDCLF
YTD Return23.51%-41.33%
1Y Return36.25%-27.44%
3Y Return (Ann)31.91%-18.77%
5Y Return (Ann)38.78%11.58%
10Y Return (Ann)23.06%1.70%
Sharpe Ratio1.08-0.62
Sortino Ratio1.82-0.76
Omega Ratio1.210.91
Calmar Ratio1.26-0.31
Martin Ratio2.86-0.97
Ulcer Index11.99%28.59%
Daily Std Dev31.74%44.40%
Max Drawdown-87.05%-98.78%
Current Drawdown-6.46%-87.80%

Fundamentals


STLDCLF
Market Cap$22.50B$5.92B
EPS$10.86-$0.94
PEG Ratio10.91-0.22
Total Revenue (TTM)$17.90B$19.97B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.08B$476.00M
EBITDA (TTM)$2.36B$822.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between STLD and CLF is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

STLD vs. CLF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, STLD achieves a 23.51% return, which is significantly higher than CLF's -41.33% return. Over the past 10 years, STLD has outperformed CLF with an annualized return of 23.06%, while CLF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.70% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.20%
-33.00%
STLD
CLF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

STLD vs. CLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for STLD, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for STLD, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for STLD, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for STLD, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for STLD, currently valued at 2.86, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.86
CLF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLF, currently valued at -0.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.62
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLF, currently valued at -0.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.76
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLF, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.91
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLF, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLF, currently valued at -0.97, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.97

STLD vs. CLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the CLF Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STLD and CLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.08
-0.62
STLD
CLF

Dividends

STLD vs. CLF - Dividend Comparison

STLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
STLD
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
1.25%1.44%1.39%1.68%2.71%2.82%2.50%1.44%1.57%3.09%2.33%2.25%
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%3.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.40%2.29%

Drawdowns

STLD vs. CLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STLD drawdown since its inception was -87.05%, smaller than the maximum CLF drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLD and CLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.46%
-87.80%
STLD
CLF

Volatility

STLD vs. CLF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) is 16.37%, while Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a volatility of 25.88%. This indicates that STLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.37%
25.88%
STLD
CLF

Financials

STLD vs. CLF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Steel Dynamics, Inc. and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items