STLD vs. CLF

In the year-to-date period, STLD achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than CLF's -15.85% return. Over the past 10 years, STLD has outperformed CLF with an annualized return of 21.88%, while CLF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.45% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current STLD Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is higher than the CLF Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STLD and CLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

STLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, while CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum STLD drawdown since its inception was -87.05%, smaller than the maximum CLF drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLD and CLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) is 19.17%, while Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a volatility of 31.70%. This indicates that STLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Steel Dynamics, Inc. and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.