FANG vs. SPYV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) is a stock, while SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Over the past 10 years, FANG returned 10.83%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for SPYV. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FANG vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 29.28% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has underperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 10.83%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.08% annualized return.

FANG

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -4.06%
• YTD: 29.28%
• 6M: 24.04%
• 1Y: 27.23%
• 3Y*: 18.15%
• 5Y*: 22.17%
• 10Y*: 10.83%

SPYV

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 1.59%
• YTD: 8.25%
• 6M: 8.02%
• 1Y: 21.87%
• 3Y*: 15.13%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 12.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FANG vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.	29.28%	-5.64%	10.35%	19.66%	35.34%	127.51%	-46.00%	0.92%	-26.35%	24.93%
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF	8.25%	13.18%	12.24%	22.20%	-5.28%	24.91%	1.38%	31.70%	-9.01%	15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FANG and SPYV is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2012	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between FANG and SPYV has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FANG vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FANG

FANG Risk / Return Rank: 73
FANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FANG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FANG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SPYV

SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 75
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FANG vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FANG	SPYV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	2.08	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	2.92	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.37	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	3.33	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.99	12.73	-7.74

FANG vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FANG Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FANG and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FANG vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than SPYV's maximum drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and SPYV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FANG	SPYV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.72%	-58.45%	-30.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.53%	-6.22%	-6.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.10%	-17.54%	-24.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.10%	-17.89%	-24.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.72%	-36.89%	-51.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.59%	-0.18%	-9.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.37%	-8.71%	-10.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.43%	1.63%	+4.80%

Volatility

FANG vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.70%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FANG	SPYV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.03%	2.70%	+8.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.10%	7.26%	+16.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.48%	9.97%	+21.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.99%	14.42%	+23.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.05%	16.94%	+32.11%

Dividends

FANG vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than SPYV's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.	2.16%	2.66%	5.06%	5.15%	6.55%	1.62%	3.10%	0.74%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF	1.68%	1.77%	2.29%	1.75%	2.22%	2.10%	2.38%	2.25%	2.97%	2.77%	2.39%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FANG and SPYV in my portfolio?

FANG and SPYV have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FANG or SPYV?

FANG has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FANG dropped -88.72% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.