FANG vs. RYCEY
FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) and RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) are both stocks. FANG operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while RYCEY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, FANG returned 11.24%/yr vs 7.82%/yr for RYCEY. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FANG vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 33.36% return, which is significantly higher than RYCEY's 6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 11.24%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 7.82% annualized return.
FANG
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 33.36%
- 6M
- 27.27%
- 1Y
- 44.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 22.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
RYCEY
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 38.97%
- 3Y*
- 110.24%
- 5Y*
- 60.04%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
FANG vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 33.36% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 6.89% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -82.05% | -12.69% | -7.35% | 40.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FANG and RYCEY is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2014 | 0.23 |
The correlation between FANG and RYCEY shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FANG:
$56.05B
RYCEY:
$140.58B
FANG:
$1.40
RYCEY:
$0.99
FANG:
141.45
RYCEY:
16.89
FANG:
3.75
RYCEY:
3.52
FANG:
1.54
RYCEY:
51.66
FANG:
$15.19B
RYCEY:
$40.04B
FANG:
$7.30B
RYCEY:
$10.10B
FANG:
$5.54B
RYCEY:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FANG vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank
FANG
RYCEY
FANG vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FANG | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 1.80 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 5.11 | +1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FANG | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.04 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 1.39 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.16 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | -0.23 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
FANG vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and RYCEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FANG | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.72% | -99.07% | +10.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -21.75% | +9.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.10% | -23.37% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.10% | -62.01% | +19.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.72% | -94.64% | +5.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.74% | -78.78% | +72.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.39% | -84.19% | +64.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.33% | 7.65% | -1.32% |
Volatility
FANG vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison
Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) have volatilities of 11.35% and 11.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FANG | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.35% | 11.26% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.88% | 32.56% | -8.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.51% | 37.74% | -6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.98% | 43.44% | -5.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.06% | 49.35% | -0.29% |
Dividends
FANG vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison
FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than RYCEY's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.09% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.76% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
Financials
FANG vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FANG vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.
RYCEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
RYCEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
RYCEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FANG and RYCEY have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FANG has higher volatility (11.35%) compared to RYCEY (11.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FANG dropped -88.72% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.
FANG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FANG and RYCEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer