PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAI vs. GXPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAI vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAI achieves a 27.58% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 16.86% return.


FAI

1D
-4.82%
1M
1.99%
YTD
27.58%
6M
26.62%
1Y
56.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GXPT

1D
-3.44%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
16.86%
6M
15.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAI vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FAI and GXPT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAI vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAI
FAI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAI vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAIGXPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

FAI vs. GXPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAI vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAI drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAI and GXPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAIGXPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-18.74%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.38%

-8.72%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-5.04%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.06%

Volatility

FAI vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAIGXPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.43%

22.91%

+4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.12%

22.91%

+8.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.12%

22.91%

+8.21%

FAI vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAI vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison

FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FAI and GXPT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FAI.

GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.

FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FAI and 0.15% for GXPT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAI and GXPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer