FAI vs. PBJ
FAI (First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF) and PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAI is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while PBJ is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FAI returned 49.94% vs 2.83% for PBJ. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. FAI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PBJ.
Performance
FAI vs. PBJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAI achieves a 28.90% return, which is significantly higher than PBJ's 8.74% return.
FAI
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 25.51%
- YTD
- 28.90%
- 1Y
- 49.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBJ
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 2.83%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
FAI vs. PBJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 28.90% | 33.37% | 2.28% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 8.74% | -1.86% | -1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAI and PBJ is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024 | -0.01 |
The correlation between FAI and PBJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAI vs. PBJ — Risk / Return Rank
FAI
PBJ
FAI vs. PBJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAI | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.04 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 0.20 | +2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.77 | 0.45 | +7.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAI vs. PBJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAI drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum PBJ drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAI and PBJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAI | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -39.15% | +11.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.84% | -12.48% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.44% | -4.41% | -4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -5.40% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.38% | 5.55% | +0.83% |
Volatility
FAI vs. PBJ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) has a higher volatility of 11.84% compared to Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) at 4.64%. This indicates that FAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAI | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.84% | 4.64% | +7.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.56% | 9.71% | +13.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.99% | 12.78% | +15.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.12% | 13.80% | +17.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.12% | 15.11% | +16.01% |
FAI vs. PBJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PBJ's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAI vs. PBJ - Dividend Comparison
FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 1.26% | 1.83% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 1.82% | 0.90% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 0.70% | 1.56% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAI and PBJ have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAI has higher volatility (11.84%) compared to PBJ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAI dropped -27.82% vs PBJ's -39.15%.
On 1-year performance, FAI leads with 49.94% vs 2.83% for PBJ. On fees, PBJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, PBJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FAI has performed better with a 49.94% return vs 2.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FAI.
PBJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.
FAI is categorized as Technology Equities, while PBJ is Consumer Staples Equities. FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FAI and 0.63% for PBJ.
FAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAI and PBJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer