PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAI vs. TDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAI vs. TDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAI achieves a 34.05% return, which is significantly higher than TDV's 21.00% return.


FAI

1D
-0.48%
1M
7.16%
YTD
34.05%
6M
33.89%
1Y
66.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDV

1D
0.34%
1M
3.53%
YTD
21.00%
6M
18.86%
1Y
32.41%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
13.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAI vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FAI and TDV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.75

The correlation between FAI and TDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAI vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAI
FAI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAI Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TDV
TDV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDV Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAI vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAITDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

3.41

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

11.25

-0.24

FAI vs. TDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the TDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAI and TDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAI vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAI drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum TDV drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAI and TDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAITDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-32.78%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-9.55%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.79%

-2.11%

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-5.35%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

2.89%

+3.14%

Volatility

FAI vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) has a higher volatility of 13.67% compared to ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) at 8.25%. This indicates that FAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAITDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.67%

8.25%

+5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.18%

14.21%

+7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.02%

18.31%

+8.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.90%

20.64%

+10.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.90%

23.27%

+7.63%

FAI vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAI vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison

FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FAI
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDV
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
0.95%1.09%1.16%1.16%1.67%1.08%1.10%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAI and TDV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAI has higher volatility (13.67%) compared to TDV (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAI dropped -27.82% vs TDV's -32.78%.

On 1-year performance, FAI leads with 66.20% vs 32.41% for TDV. On fees, FAI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FAI has performed better with a 66.20% return vs 32.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FAI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for TDV.

TDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.

FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FAI and 0.66% for TDV.

FAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAI and TDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer