EZPW vs. EAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT).

Performance

EZPW vs. EAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EZPW vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZPW EZCORP, Inc.	30.69%	58.92%	39.82%	7.24%	10.58%	53.86%	-29.77%	-11.77%	-36.64%	14.55%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	-0.52%	8.49%	206.37%	35.32%	-12.79%	-35.32%	36.16%	-0.92%	17.27%	-18.44%

Fundamentals

EPS EZPW : $1.48 EAT : $14.76
PE Ratio EZPW : 17.17 EAT : 9.67
PEG Ratio EZPW : 0.11 EAT : 0.22
PS Ratio EZPW : 1.58 EAT : 0.77
Total Revenue (TTM) EZPW : $1.34B EAT : $5.69B
Gross Profit (TTM) EZPW : $783.63M EAT : $2.64B
EBITDA (TTM) EZPW : $225.57M EAT : $752.80M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZPW achieves a 30.69% return, which is significantly higher than EAT's -0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EZPW has outperformed EAT with an annualized return of 23.89%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.50% annualized return.

EZPW

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: -4.33%
• YTD: 30.69%
• 6M: 33.30%
• 1Y: 72.42%
• 3Y*: 43.44%
• 5Y*: 37.63%
• 10Y*: 23.89%

EAT

• 1D: 4.45%
• 1M: -3.66%
• YTD: -0.52%
• 6M: 12.70%
• 1Y: -4.21%
• 3Y*: 55.46%
• 5Y*: 14.70%
• 10Y*: 13.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EZPW vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZPW

EZPW Risk / Return Rank: 90
EZPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
EZPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
EZPW Omega Ratio Rank: 89
EZPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EZPW Martin Ratio Rank: 86

EAT

EAT Risk / Return Rank: 37
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZPW vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZPW	EAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	-0.09	+2.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	0.20	+2.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.03	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	-0.07	+3.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.17	-0.17	+8.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EZPW vs. EAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZPW Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the EAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZPW and EAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZPW	EAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	-0.09	+2.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.10	0.31	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.25	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.28	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between EZPW and EAT is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EZPW vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither EZPW nor EAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EZPW EZCORP, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	3.62%	3.46%	3.71%	2.67%	2.50%

Drawdowns

EZPW vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZPW drawdown since its inception was -97.28%, which is greater than EAT's maximum drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPW and EAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZPW	EAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.28%	-88.40%	-8.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.51%	-44.41%	+23.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.94%	-69.36%	+33.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.59%	-84.94%	+8.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.33%	-24.52%	-8.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.33%	-24.34%	-34.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.92%	19.76%	-10.84%

Volatility

EZPW vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) is 9.10%, while Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that EZPW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZPW	EAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.10%	14.15%	-5.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.26%	32.94%	-8.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.95%	47.17%	-14.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.35%	48.38%	-14.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.33%	54.55%	-14.22%

Financials

EZPW vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EZCORP, Inc. and Brinker International, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EZPW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a gross profit of 222.97M and revenue of 382.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

EAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 1.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.5%.

EZPW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported an operating income of 60.61M and revenue of 382.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

EAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 168.40M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

EZPW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a net income of 44.30M and revenue of 382.02M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

EAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 128.50M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.