EZPW vs. AEM
EZPW (EZCORP, Inc.) and AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) are both stocks. EZPW operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while AEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, EZPW returned 16.75%/yr vs 15.27%/yr for AEM. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EZPW vs. AEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPW achieves a 63.95% return, which is significantly higher than AEM's 1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EZPW has outperformed AEM with an annualized return of 16.75%, while AEM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.27% annualized return.
EZPW
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- 63.95%
- 6M
- 58.64%
- 1Y
- 139.22%
- 3Y*
- 55.55%
- 5Y*
- 33.75%
- 10Y*
- 16.75%
AEM
- 1D
- -4.07%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 41.42%
- 3Y*
- 51.78%
- 5Y*
- 22.28%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
EZPW vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 63.95% | 58.92% | 39.82% | 7.24% | 10.58% | 53.86% | -29.77% | -11.77% | -36.64% | 14.55% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.68% | 119.53% | 46.04% | 8.98% | 1.08% | -22.81% | 17.39% | 54.18% | -11.51% | 10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPW and AEM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 1991 | 0.06 |
The correlation between EZPW and AEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EZPW:
$2.66B
AEM:
$86.12B
EZPW:
$1.76
AEM:
$10.60
EZPW:
18.07
AEM:
16.20
EZPW:
0.12
AEM:
0.25
EZPW:
1.79
AEM:
6.39
EZPW:
2.37
AEM:
3.28
EZPW:
$1.48B
AEM:
$13.51B
EZPW:
$865.21M
AEM:
$8.28B
EZPW:
$256.16M
AEM:
$9.72B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPW vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank
EZPW
AEM
EZPW vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZPW | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.19 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.15 | 1.31 | +11.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.47 | 3.29 | +32.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZPW | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21 | 0.97 | +3.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.61 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.41 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.17 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
EZPW vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPW drawdown since its inception was -97.28%, which is greater than AEM's maximum drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPW and AEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPW | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.28% | -90.49% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.65% | -31.77% | +21.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.51% | -31.77% | +11.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.94% | -46.22% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.59% | -53.86% | -22.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.36% | -31.77% | +15.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.12% | -46.66% | -12.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 12.61% | -8.67% |
Volatility
EZPW vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) is 11.44%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a volatility of 13.70%. This indicates that EZPW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPW | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.44% | 13.70% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.93% | 34.59% | -9.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.27% | 43.02% | -9.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.95% | 36.80% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.25% | 37.22% | +2.03% |
Dividends
EZPW vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison
EZPW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 0.99% | 0.94% | 2.05% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 2.36% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% |
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EZPW vs. AEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EZCORP, Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EZPW vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison
EZPW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a gross profit of 260.04M and revenue of 446.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.
AEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.
EZPW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.84M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
AEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.
EZPW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a net income of 49.10M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.
AEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EZPW and AEM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEM has higher volatility (13.70%) compared to EZPW (11.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPW dropped -97.28% vs AEM's -90.49%.
EZPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.21 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZPW and AEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer