EZET vs. LVHD

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZET is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZET returned -49.07% vs 14.10% for LVHD. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.

Performance

EZET vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -36.99% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 13.89% return.

EZET

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 10.09%
• 6M: -18.59%
• YTD: -36.99%
• 1Y: -49.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.66%

LVHD

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -0.29%
• 6M: 6.64%
• YTD: 13.89%
• 1Y: 14.10%
• 3Y*: 10.58%
• 5Y*: 7.41%
• 10Y*: 8.29%
• ALL TIME*: 9.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	$400.33K	$484.91K	$668.91K
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	$1.99M	$2.45M	$2.90M

EZET vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-36.99%	-11.23%	-4.77%
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	13.89%	7.50%	5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and LVHD is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.09

Return for Risk

EZET vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 3
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 4

LVHD

LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 49
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EZET vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZET	LVHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.74	1.35	-2.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.95	2.04	-2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.23	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	2.30	-3.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.07	5.67	-6.74

EZET vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZET Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZET and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZET vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -67.89%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and LVHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZET	LVHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.89%	-37.32%	-30.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.89%	-6.17%	-61.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.38%	-1.85%	-59.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.30%	-4.00%	-31.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.69%	2.50%	+43.19%

Volatility

EZET vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 4.13%. This indicates that EZET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZET	LVHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.10%	4.13%	+6.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.45%	8.31%	+35.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.94%	10.51%	+56.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.19%	13.04%	+58.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.19%	15.58%	+55.61%

EZET vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EZET vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	3.19%	3.35%	4.23%	3.55%	3.30%	2.56%	3.27%	3.30%	3.82%	3.33%	2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZET and LVHD in my portfolio?

EZET and LVHD have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZET or LVHD?

EZET has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to LVHD (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -67.89% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

Which ETF is better, EZET or LVHD?

On 1-year performance, LVHD leads with 14.10% vs -49.07% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZET or LVHD?

Over the 1-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 14.10% return vs -49.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZET or LVHD?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZET or LVHD?

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

What is the main difference between EZET and LVHD?

EZET is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while LVHD is Dividend. EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 0.27% for LVHD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.