EZET vs. QETH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and QETH (Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZET is passively managed, while QETH is actively managed. Over the past year, EZET returned -32.57% vs -32.58% for QETH. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QETH.

Performance

EZET vs. QETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EZET having a -40.23% return and QETH slightly lower at -40.24%.

EZET

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -25.14%
• YTD: -40.23%
• 6M: -43.56%
• 1Y: -32.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QETH

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -25.22%
• YTD: -40.24%
• 6M: -43.56%
• 1Y: -32.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZET vs. QETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-40.23%	-11.23%	-3.68%
QETH Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF	-40.24%	-11.44%	-3.58%

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and QETH is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024	1.00

The correlation between EZET and QETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EZET vs. QETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 5
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 5

QETH

QETH Risk / Return Rank: 5
QETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
QETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
QETH Omega Ratio Rank: 6
QETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
QETH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZET vs. QETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZET	QETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	-0.48	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	-0.34	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.96	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	-0.52	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	-0.86	0.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EZET vs. QETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZET Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is comparable to the QETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZET and QETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZET	QETH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	-0.48	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	-0.42	0.00

Drawdowns

EZET vs. QETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -64.05%, roughly equal to the maximum QETH drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and QETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZET	QETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.05%	-64.07%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.36%	-63.39%	+0.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.36%	-63.39%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.74%	-32.76%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.94%	37.96%	-0.02%

Volatility

EZET vs. QETH - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) have volatilities of 9.68% and 9.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZET	QETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.68%	9.72%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.32%	45.42%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.34%	68.40%	-0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.29%	72.22%	+0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.29%	72.22%	+0.07%

EZET vs. QETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than QETH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EZET vs. QETH - Dividend Comparison

Neither EZET nor QETH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZET and QETH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, EZET and QETH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EZET or QETH?

QETH has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to EZET (9.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -64.05% vs QETH's -64.07%.

Which ETF is better, EZET or QETH?

On 1-year performance, EZET leads with -32.57% vs -32.58% for QETH. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZET or QETH?

Over the 1-year period, EZET has performed better with a -32.57% return vs -32.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZET or QETH?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZET or QETH?

EZET and QETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EZET and QETH?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 0.25% for QETH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.