EZET vs. ETHV
EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant while ETHV tracks the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZET returned -31.70% vs -31.70% for ETHV. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHV.
Performance
EZET vs. ETHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with EZET at -39.43% and ETHV at -39.43%.
EZET
- 1D
- -5.67%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.43%
- 6M
- -42.74%
- 1Y
- -31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV
- 1D
- -5.70%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.43%
- 6M
- -42.69%
- 1Y
- -31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZET vs. ETHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -39.43% | -11.23% | -3.68% |
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -39.43% | -11.02% | -3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZET and ETHV is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 1.00 |
The correlation between EZET and ETHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZET vs. ETHV — Risk / Return Rank
EZET
ETHV
EZET vs. ETHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZET | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -0.51 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | -0.84 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZET | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | -0.47 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | -0.41 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
EZET vs. ETHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -64.05%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHV drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and ETHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZET | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.05% | -64.02% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.87% | -62.87% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.87% | -62.87% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.67% | -32.64% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.73% | 37.74% | -0.01% |
Volatility
EZET vs. ETHV - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) have volatilities of 9.88% and 9.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZET | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.88% | 9.92% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.05% | 46.03% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.43% | 68.43% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.37% | 72.30% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.37% | 72.30% | +0.07% |
EZET vs. ETHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EZET vs. ETHV - Dividend Comparison
Neither EZET nor ETHV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, EZET and ETHV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ETHV has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to EZET (9.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -64.05% vs ETHV's -64.02%.
On 1-year performance, ETHV leads with -31.70% vs -31.70% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHV has performed better with a -31.70% return vs -31.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ETHV.
EZET and ETHV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 0.20% for ETHV.
EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZET and ETHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer