EXHAX vs. EKBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX).
EXHAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 31, 1995. EKBAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 19, 1998.
Performance
EXHAX vs. EKBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXHAX vs. EKBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | -9.38% | 12.05% | 11.86% | 19.08% | -20.33% | 18.37% | 22.11% | 27.69% | -6.52% | 24.27% |
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 4.55% | 21.87% | 21.75% | 22.23% | -13.47% | 19.61% | 12.66% | 32.99% | -5.55% | 14.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXHAX achieves a -9.38% return, which is significantly lower than EKBAX's 4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, EXHAX has underperformed EKBAX with an annualized return of 8.97%, while EKBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.80% annualized return.
EXHAX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -9.38%
- 6M
- -5.53%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
EKBAX
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 36.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXHAX vs. EKBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EXHAX and EKBAX have an expense ratio of 1.10%.
Return for Risk
EXHAX vs. EKBAX — Risk / Return Rank
EXHAX
EKBAX
EXHAX vs. EKBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXHAX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.80 | -1.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 2.37 | -1.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.38 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 2.64 | -2.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 12.94 | -12.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXHAX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.80 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.78 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.80 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.46 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXHAX and EKBAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXHAX vs. EKBAX - Dividend Comparison
EXHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%, more than EKBAX's 9.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | 11.72% | 10.62% | 6.41% | 2.13% | 10.95% | 6.01% | 3.28% | 5.21% | 10.32% | 7.83% | 2.08% | 1.27% |
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 9.20% | 9.61% | 5.28% | 6.16% | 12.50% | 6.89% | 2.03% | 9.49% | 7.14% | 6.20% | 10.05% | 11.47% |
Drawdowns
EXHAX vs. EKBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXHAX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, smaller than the maximum EKBAX drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXHAX and EKBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXHAX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.96% | -55.64% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -13.29% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | -24.84% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.53% | -32.33% | +2.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.06% | -7.32% | -5.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -8.03% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 2.71% | +0.51% |
Volatility
EXHAX vs. EKBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) is 4.53%, while Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that EXHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXHAX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 5.70% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 12.79% | -3.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 20.75% | -4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 17.86% | -3.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 17.40% | -2.18% |