EKBAX vs. SWPPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX).
EKBAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 19, 1998. SWPPX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 1997.
Performance
EKBAX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EKBAX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 4.55% | 21.87% | 21.75% | 22.23% | -13.47% | 19.61% | 12.66% | 32.99% | -5.55% | 14.43% |
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund | -7.07% | 17.87% | 24.96% | 26.26% | -18.14% | 28.67% | 18.38% | 31.46% | -4.47% | 21.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKBAX achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly higher than SWPPX's -7.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EKBAX having a 13.80% annualized return and SWPPX not far behind at 13.71%.
EKBAX
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 36.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
SWPPX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -7.65%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 6M
- -4.58%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EKBAX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKBAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EKBAX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank
EKBAX
SWPPX
EKBAX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKBAX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 0.84 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 1.30 | +1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.20 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 1.06 | +1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.94 | 5.14 | +7.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKBAX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 0.84 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.68 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.76 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.48 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between EKBAX and SWPPX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EKBAX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison
EKBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, more than SWPPX's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 9.20% | 9.61% | 5.28% | 6.16% | 12.50% | 6.89% | 2.03% | 9.49% | 7.14% | 6.20% | 10.05% | 11.47% |
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund | 1.19% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.67% | 1.27% | 1.81% | 1.95% | 2.67% | 1.79% | 2.55% | 3.17% |
Drawdowns
EKBAX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKBAX drawdown since its inception was -55.64%, roughly equal to the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKBAX and SWPPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKBAX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.64% | -55.06% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -12.10% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.84% | -24.51% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.33% | -33.80% | +1.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -8.89% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -10.00% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 2.49% | +0.22% |
Volatility
EKBAX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 4.29%. This indicates that EKBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EKBAX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 4.29% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 9.11% | +3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.75% | 18.14% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 16.89% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 18.19% | -0.79% |