EKBAX vs. VUG

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EKBAX having a -5.35% return and VUG slightly lower at -5.41%. Over the past 10 years, EKBAX has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 3.49%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.57% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

EKBAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.04% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EKBAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKBAX and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EKBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than VUG's 0.50% yield.

The maximum EKBAX drawdown since its inception was -66.61%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKBAX and VUG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) is 6.75%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that EKBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.