PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUSA vs. BBHL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EUSA vs. BBHL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EUSA vs. BBHL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
-0.45%3.65%
BBHL
BBH Select Large Cap ETF
-6.51%2.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUSA achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly higher than BBHL's -6.51% return.


EUSA

1D
0.43%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
0.04%
1Y
10.19%
3Y*
12.51%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
10.96%

BBHL

1D
0.33%
1M
-5.22%
YTD
-6.51%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EUSA vs. BBHL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUSA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BBHL's 0.71% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EUSA vs. BBHL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUSA
EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BBHL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUSA vs. BBHL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUSABBHLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.13

EUSA vs. BBHL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUSABBHLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

-0.81

+1.48

Correlation

The correlation between EUSA and BBHL is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EUSA vs. BBHL - Dividend Comparison

EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while BBHL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
1.67%1.63%1.47%1.53%1.73%1.23%1.45%1.49%2.01%1.50%1.59%2.21%
BBHL
BBH Select Large Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EUSA vs. BBHL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUSA drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than BBHL's maximum drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSA and BBHL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EUSABBHLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-11.99%

-27.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.98%

-9.41%

+4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-3.42%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

Volatility

EUSA vs. BBHL - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EUSABBHLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

13.04%

+4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

13.04%

+3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

13.04%

+5.29%