BBHL vs. GVIP

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BBHL (BBH Select Large Cap ETF) and GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - BBHL tracks the Actively Managed while GVIP tracks the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBHL charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GVIP.

Performance

BBHL vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBHL achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's 16.55% return.

BBHL

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 3.93%
• YTD: 5.80%
• 6M: 6.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GVIP

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 7.07%
• YTD: 16.55%
• 6M: 18.55%
• 1Y: 38.46%
• 3Y*: 30.64%
• 5Y*: 13.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBHL vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF	5.80%	2.72%
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF	16.55%	3.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BBHL and GVIP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

BBHL vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVIP

GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 61
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 61
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBHL vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBHL	GVIP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	0.82	+0.51

Drawdowns

BBHL vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBHL drawdown since its inception was -11.99%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHL and GVIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBHL	GVIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.99%	-37.09%	+25.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.67%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-7.60%	+4.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBHL	GVIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.73%	18.13%	-5.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.73%	21.30%	-8.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.73%	21.65%	-8.92%

BBHL vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBHL has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBHL vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison

BBHL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GVIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF	0.29%	0.34%	0.29%	0.77%	0.02%	0.00%	0.12%	0.77%	0.44%	0.45%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBHL and GVIP in my portfolio?

BBHL and GVIP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBHL or GVIP?

On fees, GVIP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBHL or GVIP?

GVIP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BBHL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBHL or GVIP?

GVIP has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for BBHL.

What is the main difference between BBHL and GVIP?

BBHL tracks Actively Managed, while GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. They also come from different issuers: BBH and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BBHL and 0.45% for GVIP.