PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBHL vs. BBHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBHL vs. BBHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBHL achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly higher than BBHM's 2.14% return.


BBHL

1D
-0.15%
1M
3.93%
YTD
5.80%
6M
6.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBHM

1D
0.28%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
2.14%
6M
0.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBHL vs. BBHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BBHL
BBH Select Large Cap ETF
5.80%2.72%
BBHM
BBH Select Mid Cap ETF
2.14%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BBHL and BBHM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBHL vs. BBHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BBHL vs. BBHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBHLBBHMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.54

+0.79

Drawdowns

BBHL vs. BBHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBHL drawdown since its inception was -11.99%, which is greater than BBHM's maximum drawdown of -9.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHL and BBHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBHLBBHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.99%

-9.78%

-2.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-4.95%

+4.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.02%

-2.69%

-0.33%

Volatility

BBHL vs. BBHM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBHLBBHMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

17.52%

-4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

17.52%

-4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.73%

17.52%

-4.79%

BBHL vs. BBHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBHL has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than BBHM's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBHL vs. BBHM - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBHL nor BBHM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BBHL and BBHM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBHL is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBHL is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.

BBHL and BBHM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BBHL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BBHM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Both ETFs track Actively Managed. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BBHL and 0.81% for BBHM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBHL and BBHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer